Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

SNS型の投資詐欺やロマンス詐欺が新潟県内で急増、若者からの相談も…どうしたら防げる? 特殊詐欺撲滅へ、県警や企業などが取り組み共有

www.47news.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-07
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Niigata is a stated reporting extent. Police/company meeting location is not an operation location; June6 has no explicit calendar year and no individual enforcement action is supplied.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Niigata is a stated reporting extent. Police/company meeting location is not an operation location; June6 has no explicit calendar year and no individual enforcement action is supplied.
subject
Own regional fraud-report population described by the Niigata headline
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
The own title covers mixed investment and Romance trends and youth consultations; do not infer Romance-only incidence, individual targets, prevention effectiveness or an organized-offender network from this meeting.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
a732635c9fdcfefd2dbb302ec7eb28566fa06e7205244d8bdf51957c4a5facda
current source binding
input hash
8db59ee09ec8ef2629c2d57824dbe570787cba8709f0c1d406fa07eccceb6e32
decision id
d07293e1e5fad5e5a1a33beb69690d56ad351bfe2e5e4dfac9ce3c30f9242586
document id
19f399eaaee3a364133a83709c1c71478f856cfcd1b866320196c2f2bf26685b
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e88c810aeffa6a87d3c04deba78058c3266db3b1c4703290b50afc4fa42bd2e8
finding evidence sha256
8b50c68a681c6f4459412f976ab13336806bc6b575c258abbf26d4aa65fd81cd
enrichment payload sha256
b5ebdb8fd3353db3436e51d19dc7cde4f341ee9cfefd9740cf708ad8e117c010
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/19f399eaaee3a364133a83709c1c71478f856cfcd1b866320196c2f2bf26685b/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
7c22cf266dba37bb3ab4e23f28afbb0eb80659562705e0d327c0eb03e4164190

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmnot reported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 19f399eaaee3a364133a83709c1c71478f856cfcd1b866320196c2f2bf26685b
Decision: d07293e1e5fad5e5a1a33beb69690d56ad351bfe2e5e4dfac9ce3c30f9242586
Base reviewed revision: a732635c9fdcfefd2dbb302ec7eb28566fa06e7205244d8bdf51957c4a5facda

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.