development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- single_case
- value
- reported_loss
- reason
- Own woman's reported loss only; no case union or additional case credit.
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
Betrug mit der Liebe: Frau online um 100.000 Euro betrogen
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
Story groups for this report
Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.
How to read this record
Different URL was fully read/bound, no actual receipt reused for semantic credit. No technical function from online, separate-case identity, national country from German text/outlet, actyear, clinical harm or money recovery inferred.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
Current annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- c7118a09b2d9aa3e06a70793bdbf40e0ed7ef93356cbcd039abc074780bd0135
- current source binding
- input hash
- 202421f2b17dea6da0af6771352aa23993d84e45a7ab7323d1c9a05fc71a0ff7
- decision id
- 82eab34d3063b24b4d256f5ebe1b514cf6611745a0069b76c2c37599d397e7b2
- document id
- 21fab41f074d56de1fe90f060331e9eb179f75c71bba64512249e135f5dfe02d
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- 446e3132af61ca07bc7699cfa4ce408be968f21fbfabd2196fe0a75ecfec0f4c
- finding evidence sha256
- c04ba877453e2735e308c55a3f7b91a54d5db831abd01776e3f3cbdcb6f633ee
- enrichment payload sha256
- fb0a72653803007f619a2cd83101a3d70bd7687fd17b83578921744f9a4d6aa4
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/21fab41f074d56de1fe90f060331e9eb179f75c71bba64512249e135f5dfe02d/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- annotation key
- 8bc4414dd1beca5328d85ad2c9d78df88be9e30f05a45685d8f01faaf299e970
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Financial and property harm
cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Own100,000euro loss; do not add duplicated text as extra loss.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- source associates
Relationship-based deception
fabricated relationshipgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Own definition of pretended romantic interest.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | insufficient context |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 21fab41f074d56de1fe90f060331e9eb179f75c71bba64512249e135f5dfe02d
Decision: 82eab34d3063b24b4d256f5ebe1b514cf6611745a0069b76c2c37599d397e7b2
Base reviewed revision: c7118a09b2d9aa3e06a70793bdbf40e0ed7ef93356cbcd039abc074780bd0135
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.