Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

Seminole County Sheriffs Office warns of romance scammers: $700 million lost in 2022, according to FBI

www.wogx.comEnglishObserved 2024-10-23
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Seminole Sheriff source attributes2022 nearly20K/>700mRomance losses to FBI. Counts/period/attribution preserved, not independently verified unique victims or all locallySeminole; aggregate loss route unknown.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Investigation or court: United States

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
d61918bea382b1894fc7e23a916ee8754883fcb34041990175bd80ae9f500b47
current source binding
input hash
4250b0462819ce1adf61aba51d9a0483079bf0f1acdd106997c6dc06382db787
decision id
ff21eb56ec9177a2c9453c2eea66c71a6e9904ea5a227c02f4b181d5e18e38ae
document id
23df34493568fa4d68c9edc3c5e004d097ec8b70a3ae9b5ce2fa9444770d0999
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
c7dc9192fd714b10b536a78518dd81531901a56c45030d24b04c5ea65d21501f
finding evidence sha256
38e293f7073ac310aeed3bb1847a3a7e686301252ff7c5a065ffa0cd24c6af77
enrichment payload sha256
2d2efa7610e4af168dd22ca16d71ab1bc10cc1afab59eefce1bd8e6789c18982
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/23df34493568fa4d68c9edc3c5e004d097ec8b70a3ae9b5ce2fa9444770d0999/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
c56a1bd80ce0bb572be74e7d1b90395ca088e1860bd2a276a9563ca258d21f91

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 23df34493568fa4d68c9edc3c5e004d097ec8b70a3ae9b5ce2fa9444770d0999
Decision: ff21eb56ec9177a2c9453c2eea66c71a6e9904ea5a227c02f4b181d5e18e38ae
Base reviewed revision: d61918bea382b1894fc7e23a916ee8754883fcb34041990175bd80ae9f500b47

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.