Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Pelahustán, un teléfono móvil y un delito de 'sextorsión'

www.latribunadetoledo.esSpanishObserved 2024-07-25
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own title names sextortion and description reports a neighbor's lost phone later used by a woman for Romance fraud against a third person. Preserve sexual-extortion allegation, phone method and neighbor's loss report, not a proved theft, police investigation, financial payment, sexual injury, returned scam funds or named intimate persona. The reporting neighbor is a separate harmed role, not automatically the financial target.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own title names sextortion and description reports a neighbor's lost phone later used by a woman for Romance fraud against a third person. Preserve sexual-extortion allegation, phone method and neighbor's loss report, not a proved theft, police investigation, financial payment, sexual injury, returned scam funds or named intimate persona. The reporting neighbor is a separate harmed role, not automatically the financial target.
subject
own_phone_misuse_sextortion_and_neighbor_report
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
distinct_neighbor_and_financial_target_roles_no_paid_amount_or_sexual_injury
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
bf34ccef740fccc0e1bc36a5c4cf8df0db97fe0782dc34b1d3425a6c1fdd4b8f
current source binding
input hash
5cf8ccd8025a0f403d710fadcf8278d5e3c60993abfe29e69f11bf5bb56722a9
decision id
ba274b50e331fa180421696e9424456989b784e994f3d2e84c00bc794207f061
document id
25e26c512beb7929a744d467a385a9477dcd9966dd5d5f48da8849033ed30b23
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
2558e7f0ff25d980a092d9ef5d6fe005eea4b2b2db671cb2acbd15ae79899a3e
finding evidence sha256
1a6924d631809fcaf5340fd4aa49397c94cba7275f2c981205609459763008be
enrichment payload sha256
ae5b8bac93c76d4d6a9da80286dcc95c65f8e92059a42a5edc655ed76fd2acc1
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/25e26c512beb7929a744d467a385a9477dcd9966dd5d5f48da8849033ed30b23/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
db3f786529ba0372f470543c2deb4c9f208f54177d91987991990afee431261f

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Blackmail and extortion

sexualreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

reportreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
relative or other harmed person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionreported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harminsufficient context
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendinginsufficient context
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 25e26c512beb7929a744d467a385a9477dcd9966dd5d5f48da8849033ed30b23
Decision: ba274b50e331fa180421696e9424456989b784e994f3d2e84c00bc794207f061
Base reviewed revision: bf34ccef740fccc0e1bc36a5c4cf8df0db97fe0782dc34b1d3425a6c1fdd4b8f

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.