development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- single_case
- value
- sentence
- reason
- Own headline supplies nine-year imposed sentence despite clipped description. No requested sentence/fine/service/date borrowed.
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
「頂き女子」に懲役９年
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Clipping ends 懲役; headline supplies9years. No fine/requestedterm fromanother URL, actual yearsserved, nationalcountry fromNagoya, eventyear fromday22, technical method, network or manual-sale extra offence inferred. Plural men not multiplecase proof.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
Investigation or court: Japan
Basis: place_mapping
Scope: single_case
Reason: ROOT selected this own Nagoya court sentencing context only. Preserve clipping, exact fullwidth forms, no physical attendance or details transferred from another URL.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- single_case
- value
- charge
- reason
- Own charges clause, not derived merely from sentence.
Source statement flags
No listed valuedevelopment assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- article
- value
- reported_loss
- reason
- Own aggregate extraction, no count of cases/target allocation or unshown fine.
Source statement flags
No listed valueCurrent annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- a75f3d97694acdbc8373b73ff246184909d5392f163aec19ed58b0ffeef6e0d1
- current source binding
- input hash
- aefdd863543b824b4dae8ac7bf407d36d402ccbd892f29addba3020d74b31d3c
- decision id
- ddb5b59c05173e0712ac4ddd511a8a4b1cb50a2cf90f25a08c2018483dca6603
- document id
- 2f3d8d6589eceda0652d6228052f5410c6d97ccbafbe2da6d49a860da81a122b
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- 6542f33d47b9f05d6bf027b63e555b9c5c14cebdfec5735c42b7be36d14a0875
- finding evidence sha256
- 1184795830b94f14364d186b7470ccb89b097e9e8693caa145bd9dd5bb9c87aa
- enrichment payload sha256
- 617ba8567a5f9d5baceb8617703491e10ea4a7a969faf1231cb97dd4b1420d1c
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/2f3d8d6589eceda0652d6228052f5410c6d97ccbafbe2da6d49a860da81a122b/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- annotation key
- 2ad388c8c6848821273635dbd66cab418700f6d938537f5dbabdb5ab4f310b4c
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Financial and property harm
cashallegationStage: completed
About155millionyen, no additional sum.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- source associates
Justice proceedings and outcomes
chargereported occurrenceStage: completed
Fraud and unspecified other charges, not invented tax/offence details.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Justice proceedings and outcomes
sentencereported occurrenceStage: completed
Nine years imposed, not served.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Relationship-based deception
trust manipulationallegationStage: completed
Explicit exploitation of affection for money in own manual/account.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | not reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 2f3d8d6589eceda0652d6228052f5410c6d97ccbafbe2da6d49a860da81a122b
Decision: ddb5b59c05173e0712ac4ddd511a8a4b1cb50a2cf90f25a08c2018483dca6603
Base reviewed revision: a75f3d97694acdbc8373b73ff246184909d5392f163aec19ed58b0ffeef6e0d1
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.