Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

40.000 Euro Schaden: Henneferin fällt auf Liebesbetrüger „Dr. Albert Roland“ rein

ga.deGermanObserved 2024-07-09–2024-07-26
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Hennef woman report alleges40000EUR lost to an unknown person posing as Dr Albert Roland from America and gaining trust. F is broad money-loss subtype, not a physical-cash handover. Claimed doctor/America is persona, not actual occupation/operation; no platform, payment route, actyear, diagnosis, refund or clinical cause is supplied.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Hennef woman report alleges40000EUR lost to an unknown person posing as Dr Albert Roland from America and gaining trust. F is broad money-loss subtype, not a physical-cash handover. Claimed doctor/America is persona, not actual occupation/operation; no platform, payment route, actyear, diagnosis, refund or clinical cause is supplied.
subject
own_claimed_doctor_persona
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
source_specific_interpretation_limit
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
b98edc357c71115ec051f0b0950001fe0490d247648fdcf725dabe9fe1da8269
current source binding
input hash
13970f688f8f1255fab1a9ec585cf899fb4f0b65c71611122e9d52f2828a8cc4
decision id
91dc37566b19fb07de7381fc37ab8b5bb9da76cd693ce9a7701206e7b909a481
document id
2faca6bf735be7d38dc167938d50e49f53b6184932a359989d22236d517cb913
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
ef410c337f188b144833f135ce35010c48531ff6baed592ea1123fe9d76f1985
finding evidence sha256
7b891077b5b2d231e71b80f418331ac6222d06a254b71b003443559d2dd954bb
enrichment payload sha256
e963599b0ef77afce317ad593348a6d7fe9838f9ee5d8d3674c402090ad402ec
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/2faca6bf735be7d38dc167938d50e49f53b6184932a359989d22236d517cb913/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
82317863d4c4c38c6034a21b1ef3f2a9686fa4be2fd673b9ac101e381733d3ef

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 2faca6bf735be7d38dc167938d50e49f53b6184932a359989d22236d517cb913
Decision: 91dc37566b19fb07de7381fc37ab8b5bb9da76cd693ce9a7701206e7b909a481
Base reviewed revision: b98edc357c71115ec051f0b0950001fe0490d247648fdcf725dabe9fe1da8269

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.