Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「一緒に住む家買うため、投資して」 大館の男性が655万ロマンス詐欺被害|秋田魁新報電子版

www.sakigake.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-08
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Reported655万円 loss following invest-for-shared-home pretext. No actual home purchase/housing harm, refund, arrest or calendar year supplied.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
No actual home purchase/housing harm, refund, arrest or calendar year supplied.
subject
Odate man in his forties
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Reported655万円 loss following invest-for-shared-home pretext.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
9337489f44e1a7f607d7e8e0e481702344c4a4ee1b9d6af356862a0382afdc0d
current source binding
input hash
ea38afa3dad7b5859c872617c024fecbd983f301bc65df7030e06e81901f7531
decision id
02e2f94d424d64bfb6c59ad284bf230e8416e44d1e84051cc3b11da2904302eb
document id
377309d53a02f8c4f0266042aad46c388e600c763008a98e0728fe410e2e9a14
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
d00b4cece5401662a86e423ca16efcb450e640f805b55b71f9a8dc99e654b080
finding evidence sha256
5c996fef4db35ec00cf8498ceb26734dbe5bd3afe067aaa437f17c269153f288
enrichment payload sha256
694f6965369c5ae01dc92415df1c4ff51068f0edc08f41dbcaf446cc7a6ffb7b
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/377309d53a02f8c4f0266042aad46c388e600c763008a98e0728fe410e2e9a14/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
145edd3eb7d6a0afea3034417d1d2acc43102a2bbf9d5f26a2ed4bd2f4d2c053

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 377309d53a02f8c4f0266042aad46c388e600c763008a98e0728fe410e2e9a14
Decision: 02e2f94d424d64bfb6c59ad284bf230e8416e44d1e84051cc3b11da2904302eb
Base reviewed revision: 9337489f44e1a7f607d7e8e0e481702344c4a4ee1b9d6af356862a0382afdc0d

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.