Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

Letitia James issues warning as New Yorkers increasingly fall for romance scams, with some victims losing up to $1M

nypost.comEnglishObserved 2024-06-08
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own New York warning claims some romance-scam victims lose up to$1million and describes romance-based investment schemes. The upper amount is not a total, mean, identified individual loss or independently verified incidence measure; no currency ISO is supplied. No fuller alert, technical platform, actor identity, clinical effect, restitution or event year is imported.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United States

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own New York warning claims some romance-scam victims lose up to$1million and describes romance-based investment schemes. The upper amount is not a total, mean, identified individual loss or independently verified incidence measure; no currency ISO is supplied. No fuller alert, technical platform, actor identity, clinical effect, restitution or event year is imported.
subject
own reported source subjects
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
bounded own-source interpretation; unsupported facts withheld
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
b9a46538e2f7e61f57ed31cee430efebaff349c089a96eb973089c2effc3f9bf
current source binding
input hash
50e3e7c76cfee678a370f6e45c04e016bbd824a17de83b10fd655489e4d642ea
decision id
a73ac7a6c2ed7b4714d07985efa33f20487d7b8f0bbb725cb757fd6cee28b744
document id
473e1021b53242efe7fe6430ca23880331bac865d205b0df92263aff73c1ade5
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
4a266261019470ae12e014c3beed9279b52df3b8976a663dba49125ba4899078
finding evidence sha256
9a47701aead3f7e2881d2eb15beba600522fff616e80ab4c1ddbdb4704096825
enrichment payload sha256
d76cf292d308fe4840483176ca6df23bd904a2a9b5344beb8b6dac77f04b3e3a
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/473e1021b53242efe7fe6430ca23880331bac865d205b0df92263aff73c1ade5/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
9b76d688ef4c52f504c1b0643e2c7ae061455fee3c8dc7aec6dc082ed8783f9a

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradinggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 473e1021b53242efe7fe6430ca23880331bac865d205b0df92263aff73c1ade5
Decision: a73ac7a6c2ed7b4714d07985efa33f20487d7b8f0bbb725cb757fd6cee28b744
Base reviewed revision: b9a46538e2f7e61f57ed31cee430efebaff349c089a96eb973089c2effc3f9bf

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.