development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- single_case
- value
- reported_loss
- reason
- Reported50000–100000EUR range, no exactsum.
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
Landes : victime d’une « escroquerie sentimentale », il perd entre 50 000 et 100 000 euros
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
Story groups for this report
Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.
How to read this record
Impersonation sentence ends se font passer pour des with missing object: do not complete identity or intimate approach. Landes and French language/domain are not country proxies. Beginning-of-week is not an explicit calendar year. No recovery, actual arrest/guilt, psychological consequence or source-body fetching.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- article
- value
- warning
- reason
- Actual police vigilance appeal.
Source statement flags
No listed valueCurrent annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- b554d6c811abc53ed5546a430f06a6945d26b6ff6ae32d7d4a9ef7bc4a0add58
- current source binding
- input hash
- 0310960534b5a83d6394a1e83235bcbfa2c88e509b08d6b92fa055bae18d3ced
- decision id
- 985b8f536a0a60b4fff28edf2b2004dd7e7a60c50bab1cd8edf68fa9b6ea2e08
- document id
- 52c2d2ab1119b1148dc9eb66f5fae82f9a786247f2deabc973136d480d3e6e67
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- 017ff7783e17a0771b6e69b8e530aaa4252e6f23e6722c2da6e552cd640fda7d
- finding evidence sha256
- 7cb3e33813031cc9e43b247f4d72fcc5d81b1743a01b963cd884267b3686c137
- enrichment payload sha256
- 7e2024b1ef3404b9db81925f50cebcdd1aafea5e5ca66517e6305c80ff73a3cf
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/52c2d2ab1119b1148dc9eb66f5fae82f9a786247f2deabc973136d480d3e6e67/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- annotation key
- 12c71dcac2c667657d2270f1d8edbab8366e2d31153009d73fa58ce88dbe1aad
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Financial and property harm
cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Preserve stated50,000–100,000euro range as own source loss, not a precise total.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- source associates
Help, reporting and prevention
reportreported occurrenceStage: completed
Complaint reported; not a completed investigation, arrest or conviction.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- source associated
- Causal claim
- not established
Help, reporting and prevention
warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Police warning distinct from case complaint.
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- authority
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | not reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | insufficient context |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 52c2d2ab1119b1148dc9eb66f5fae82f9a786247f2deabc973136d480d3e6e67
Decision: 985b8f536a0a60b4fff28edf2b2004dd7e7a60c50bab1cd8edf68fa9b6ea2e08
Base reviewed revision: b554d6c811abc53ed5546a430f06a6945d26b6ff6ae32d7d4a9ef7bc4a0add58
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.