Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

芸能人に直接会える「ファンカード」?…福井信用金庫職員がロマンス詐欺被害を未然に防止 鯖江署から感謝状 | 社会 | 福井のニュース | 福井新聞ONLINE

www.fukuishimbun.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-10-14
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Sabae30male2500dollarcelebrity fan-card remittance blocked/bankpoliceaward. Notpaidloss/realcelebrity/forgedformalcard/refund; wrong fan-channelnotclinical. Current own-context qualification: Deceptive fan-card meeting pretext does not establish a particular impersonated persona.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Requested remittance interrupted; not paidloss/refund or proof of particular persona/forged formal card.
subject
fan_card_interception
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
interception
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
973b346aadd8ffc7e6bc685fd53d430d177c8509758a15e0cd9ac8fb85b156b7
current source binding
input hash
ac0c503118f5f72dd2ec2844a54b3c002babd525acdb1c74a456a354a4e125ac
decision id
97837ca52248a51d1dd90bb53c78da5d8e756e5d7c3fd15e319964aa7ec4bd97
document id
5717a58d7176b3fa2621d16c91ab8fb77c74187850b6bad92b84656ce4e290eb
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
48f907809d94c0ecc3dd9caafe2ebcbbe4f55a5372c324b42e9d63e566acd6cc
finding evidence sha256
279d626590d19c8c1b0fc0e6a8164825e3e02b7e0c588500f3c939e012cc5951
enrichment payload sha256
ee0941f4cfd0bb14b86bb2813332cbb159913b045fdce85b085fda1d9cd1d414
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/5717a58d7176b3fa2621d16c91ab8fb77c74187850b6bad92b84656ce4e290eb/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
71746baefc23d98b8b97835b8240cb1302c8f3cd06049c2f57430690823d4e10

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: attempted
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Protection or recovery of assets

interceptreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

practical supportreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
support provider
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsreported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendinginsufficient context
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 5717a58d7176b3fa2621d16c91ab8fb77c74187850b6bad92b84656ce4e290eb
Decision: 97837ca52248a51d1dd90bb53c78da5d8e756e5d7c3fd15e319964aa7ec4bd97
Base reviewed revision: 973b346aadd8ffc7e6bc685fd53d430d177c8509758a15e0cd9ac8fb85b156b7

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.