Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「ロマンス詐欺」で2860万円被害 青森県の60代男性が投資話で詐取される

www.sankei.comJapaneseObserved 2024-07-12
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Aomori report gives a prefectural male in his60s, about28.6millionJPY cash obtained through affection/familiarity and an investment story. Keep trust manipulation and the own investment link. Neither age alone nor police attribution proves vulnerability, investigation, digital platform, refund or calendar incident year.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Aomori report gives a prefectural male in his60s, about28.6millionJPY cash obtained through affection/familiarity and an investment story. Keep trust manipulation and the own investment link. Neither age alone nor police attribution proves vulnerability, investigation, digital platform, refund or calendar incident year.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own source scope/stage/inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
76a1a3fbe3ace2becb63d8044d6e1150b0177a5ea933980489474f1b95bd0935
current source binding
input hash
f7471ba3d019c8267638d492af0f9a0e86ee0fb552ea1e0f48ba0b774da1f479
decision id
541b2e2f8403c94dbed93534d00eb3ab49b92e3b366710e47bb12a46fb623a72
document id
57a38542d8a676ccc38b57bf7f8dac90d507bd112cc59355f90445a4c18afa8a
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e68d0887bcc600b60bb1dc147016e3959e715672f655e0b67c1c9766109a1ecf
finding evidence sha256
f439bb3ff85056fb340c8054fcce8ac0e782c20e42efd69fa906917f867cb83d
enrichment payload sha256
93d03283e93f2beab749c9688fc73bca0e10e72a57fb3144dbe1effe1d95a446
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/57a38542d8a676ccc38b57bf7f8dac90d507bd112cc59355f90445a4c18afa8a/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
58bd64d448fde9f52a7a3337aa8a7331fa56cc4ab8c1a1e0fd6c7dbeb6abf4e5

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 57a38542d8a676ccc38b57bf7f8dac90d507bd112cc59355f90445a4c18afa8a
Decision: 541b2e2f8403c94dbed93534d00eb3ab49b92e3b366710e47bb12a46fb623a72
Base reviewed revision: 76a1a3fbe3ace2becb63d8044d6e1150b0177a5ea933980489474f1b95bd0935

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.