Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

New York AG Sounds Alarm on "Pig Butchering" Romance Scams

1045theteam.comEnglishObserved 2024-01-26–2024-06-07
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Each of these five URLs has the same own full title and description: a New York attorney-general warning about pig-butchering romance scams and a claimed billions-wide scheme. The amount is an unverified aggregate without currency, period or case denominator; it is not five independent losses or proven all-Romance incidence. The typo Letitia Jams remains the saved spelling. No investment details are borrowed from fuller warning articles.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United States

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Each of these five URLs has the same own full title and description: a New York attorney-general warning about pig-butchering romance scams and a claimed billions-wide scheme. The amount is an unverified aggregate without currency, period or case denominator; it is not five independent losses or proven all-Romance incidence. The typo Letitia Jams remains the saved spelling. No investment details are borrowed from fuller warning articles.
subject
own reported source subjects
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
bounded own-source interpretation; unsupported facts withheld
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
1cea8a0d46a4d4b18deb60d676349483f6fd176d75ab772bf3209542811c8cf4
current source binding
input hash
9cd84c2c17fcd5d1ea24afb10af9d1e275eb677156310bc35d69f16e7fbb6c35
decision id
35524c3c4c27ce6ac990bebbd7e4316430990bcdf4859a3c9680142c054128a6
document id
5c8b2e319ac76206acb40242a48892ecca26d7774b5d1ef2baffb3421873785c
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
429c148adb25a3151411fdb5e428585d9b69d87543e1f56b9666d67e88a581fd
finding evidence sha256
d84b438c03a80a1e8ecfed50ddfb8ecfeaca0d8cf3c65395ad6b8d2bdfc3d82f
enrichment payload sha256
a1c20e7dec66f14a0c83986a628a7d71b214cae811826a6f0b8eb67bcb9d8253
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/5c8b2e319ac76206acb40242a48892ecca26d7774b5d1ef2baffb3421873785c/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
1d18974e28ebef41ac35e7b263dab31950e96c37cf086fe978db2fbbb1d5bc75

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 5c8b2e319ac76206acb40242a48892ecca26d7774b5d1ef2baffb3421873785c
Decision: 35524c3c4c27ce6ac990bebbd7e4316430990bcdf4859a3c9680142c054128a6
Base reviewed revision: 1cea8a0d46a4d4b18deb60d676349483f6fd176d75ab772bf3209542811c8cf4

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.