Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

SNS型投資・ロマンス詐欺急増 島根県警が対策強化 | 日本海新聞 NetNihonkai

www.nnn.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-05-16
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Investment and relationship-continuation are alternative pretexts; no relationship-led trading mechanism is described. SNS is a generic venue and no technical feature appears. The financial-institution coordination sentence is clipped, so no completed assistance, payment intercept, enacted policy or effect is supplied. Since the latter half of last year remains relative; Shimane is not a national-country proxy.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

code
response.enforcement
field
desc
reason
Planned cross-department investigative response discussed at emergency meeting; not proof a specific investigation concluded.
subject
Own source described subject(s); no name borrowed from another source
subtype
investigation
dimensions
scope
mixed_fraud
stage
planned
stance
quoted
speaker
police
causality
not_established
scam link
mixed_scheme
actor role
authority
statement type
reported_occurrence
record note
Investment and relationship-continuation are alternative pretexts; no relationship-led trading mechanism is described. SNS is a generic venue and no technical feature appears. The financial-institution coordination sentence is clipped, so no completed assistance, payment intercept, enacted policy or effect is supplied. Since the latter half of last year remains relative; Shimane is not a national-country proxy.
context kind
own_source_procedural_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Planned investigative coordination, not completed specific-case investigation.
subject name literals
No listed value
original compiled application
code
response.enforcement
alias
direct_literal/response.enforcement/investigation
scope
mixed_fraud
stage
planned
stance
quoted
speaker
police
subtype
investigation
group id
W20240513_20240519G049
causality
not_established
record id
W20240513_20240519C0021
scam link
mixed_scheme
actor role
authority
decision id
b52a65fde060eccfb865f17f94eace9a06fd5a9d661ef3a6a345d46dd8557299
document id
5ea924a7e203e23fa6ae349ae11dc77d9b1252ad1025727adb33dc8f2c845094
application id
W20240513_20240519A00139
interpretation
Planned cross-department investigative response discussed at emergency meeting; not proof a specific investigation concluded.
statement type
reported_occurrence
source truth verified
false
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Investment and relationship-continuation are alternative pretexts; no relationship-led trading mechanism is described. SNS is a generic venue and no technical feature appears. The financial-institution coordination sentence is clipped, so no completed assistance, payment intercept, enacted policy or effect is supplied. Since the latter half of last year remains relative; Shimane is not a national-country proxy.
field
interpretation
context kind
ROOT_qualified_source_specific_current_interpretation
own role source layer limits
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
country.victim
Item 5
date.incident
Item 6
date.procedural
Item 7
development.reported_development
unknown role meaning
No selected approved assertion for that role; not a categorical source denial
unknown role reasons
date.incident
No selected explicit event-calendar literal; relative dates, publication/URL years and durations cannot fill this role.
country.victim
No selected validated source-bound assertion for this country role; original place/persona/nationality/context proposals are preserved, not treated as source absence.
date.procedural
No selected explicit event-calendar literal; relative dates, publication/URL years and durations cannot fill this role.
country.operation
No selected validated source-bound assertion for this country role; original place/persona/nationality/context proposals are preserved, not treated as source absence.
country.publisher
Publisher location is not selected as a core-case country.
country.jurisdiction
No selected validated source-bound assertion for this country role; original place/persona/nationality/context proposals are preserved, not treated as source absence.
development.reported development
Meeting and planned cross-department inquiry retained; no selected enum assertion upgrades a plan to completed investigation.
source truth verified
false
case identity verified
false
currentcoding34 SQL approved
false
ownrole assertion scope limits
No listed value
final QC role code join not bypassed
true
exact ROOT qualified ownrole record note
PROPOSED role interpretations from saved admitted notes, not final country/calendar/development approval. Unknown is a proposal partition, not categorical source absence. All original actors/places/calendars/developments/amounts/limits remain exact in the separate three-layer history. No new SOURCE reading or independent truth validation.
all stronger current overlaps and21plus3U preservation still required
true
is entire code dimension denial
false
exact ROOT qualified record note
Investment and relationship-continuation are alternative pretexts; no relationship-led trading mechanism is described. SNS is a generic venue and no technical feature appears. The financial-institution coordination sentence is clipped, so no completed assistance, payment intercept, enacted policy or effect is supplied. Since the latter half of last year remains relative; Shimane is not a national-country proxy.
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
8a2aeaa76a3580369966f15eac72b8ebb5400a3b522c6f6605e52158222323bf
current source binding
input hash
ee2dfc0c7ec67ad4f465641da60867555fe017f92ae909d2b6d471d33d192e79
decision id
b52a65fde060eccfb865f17f94eace9a06fd5a9d661ef3a6a345d46dd8557299
document id
5ea924a7e203e23fa6ae349ae11dc77d9b1252ad1025727adb33dc8f2c845094
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
c33c0dcbb59d1bb8aaae76ded85f441f6b17a3cb41a7de734f60d44a5e3e7e81
finding evidence sha256
bd5b7c3fab30fc0dcdd13cf9dd2483f8edb131984632ccee7133127450827b3a
enrichment payload sha256
d2cfc491745e63ea225453c60d062074ccf81f6c59c30957646fcbe025e83d3b
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/5ea924a7e203e23fa6ae349ae11dc77d9b1252ad1025727adb33dc8f2c845094/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
f86e875f4026d812ed798b0d197a179c696607bc05fd5af9f205709f959683d8

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed

General described taking of money in mixed categories; no amount or independently counted incidents.

Interpretation details
Scope
mixed fraud
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
source associates

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationgeneral warningStage: not applicable

Explicit relationship-continuation pretext for extracting money; no actual persona inferred.

Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investigation and operational response

investigationreported occurrenceStage: planned

Planned cross-department investigative response discussed at emergency meeting; not proof a specific investigation concluded.

Interpretation details
Scope
mixed fraud
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsereported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 5ea924a7e203e23fa6ae349ae11dc77d9b1252ad1025727adb33dc8f2c845094
Decision: b52a65fde060eccfb865f17f94eace9a06fd5a9d661ef3a6a345d46dd8557299
Base reviewed revision: 8a2aeaa76a3580369966f15eac72b8ebb5400a3b522c6f6605e52158222323bf

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.