Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

"Que je suis gourde!": victime d’une escroquerie amoureuse, une Varoise perd 150.000 euros

www.nicematin.comFrenchObserved 2024-10-08
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Var150000EUR loss and RenéWilliams fakewealth/60sManchester persona, quotedselfgourde. Quotedselfblame notresearcherendorsement/clinicalharm; realestateclaim notpropertyloss/investmentmechanism/actualUKoperation.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: France

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Quoted selfblame not researcher endorsement/clinicalcondition; supposedwealth/Manchester not actual operation country.
subject
Var_self_stigma
reported outcome
quoted_self_blame
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
f7c84f24742b02c6edf2d20cd735d366eaed9068a1d500081537d4a0e72f22ea
current source binding
input hash
260ab71f526b60f7955871a25d68818b58b9c55aa5bf516c0ddb9fbb2348f23e
decision id
8e8cf2025be363c6b804a2a42b57e1268685ceef35b7f5e5640d2a415783cf1c
document id
69f798ec2fc499404cfd2238aadd7288ed22e3a9c18fbe41343615dd1a25eb28
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
849dd80f37031fdb5a7cd35adbe48427d0d2266a9d361185eb4cf6c2baf1788e
finding evidence sha256
4eb3882a2a835e48b239d5d84205e29fdb4c225c2fabbaec2545b9170f0622a7
enrichment payload sha256
0c530c69906a31500549883240d3b4e6ff5d24074a51861c65b25ce0932edc45
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/69f798ec2fc499404cfd2238aadd7288ed22e3a9c18fbe41343615dd1a25eb28/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
fa819f8eee4fa5fb8add394cd56701612947b36c5779e736514f58bb50d8daa5

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Blame, stigma and responsibility framing

self blamecommentaryStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingreported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 69f798ec2fc499404cfd2238aadd7288ed22e3a9c18fbe41343615dd1a25eb28
Decision: 8e8cf2025be363c6b804a2a42b57e1268685ceef35b7f5e5640d2a415783cf1c
Base reviewed revision: f7c84f24742b02c6edf2d20cd735d366eaed9068a1d500081537d4a0e72f22ea

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.