Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

35歲男戀愛詐財340萬!深情話術4女上當 女友崩潰:看新聞才知道 | 國際 | 三立新聞網 SETN.COM

www.setn.comChinese (traditional)Observed 2025-03-21
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

UKPeterGray35romancefourwomen3400000NTDheadconverted/noseparateGBPamount, girlfriendfindsnews andonevictimgavebirth. Sevenyearsentence/sourceclaimnotverifiedtermserved, shockedgirlfrienddistressnotallwomenclinical. Shockheadlineconcernsgirlfrienddiscoveringfraud, notallfourfinancialtargets/clinicaldiagnosis. Noindependentmedicalassessment.

Places in the available evidence

Investigation or court: United Kingdom

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

sentencereported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Psychological distress

distressreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
relative or other harmed person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violenceinsufficient context
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressreported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harminsufficient context
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 74db23df6d36832545893aaba86e1d76b1b0d6d4346176fabcf76e0a1ae840b4
Decision: b84315efe87a9d41effec0ba18ee19a0c5a12c06de35a4ed9cdb6866f1a76bf0
Current revision: 6e66aa5ffdcae832ebadb0fa774804f8c2b6089f4b3249036191c7495d88cbad

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.