Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

悉尼银行职员在“杀猪盘”浪漫骗局中损失$157,000 - 博客 | 文学城

blog.wenxuecity.comChineseObserved 2024-06-01
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own title reports157000 dollars of bank savings lost and description identifies a friend/online dating platform. Currency ISO remains unknown. The ChatGPT translation request is editorial, not deceptive AI use; banking employment is not employer-funds theft. Sydney workplace does not establish target residence. Exact own record W20240527_20240602C0036.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own title reports157000 dollars of bank savings lost and description identifies a friend/online dating platform. Currency ISO remains unknown. The ChatGPT translation request is editorial, not deceptive AI use; banking employment is not employer-funds theft. Sydney workplace does not establish target residence.
subject
own reported source subjects
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
bounded own-source interpretation; unsupported facts withheld
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
38b5808228db39ba1a88153acdb4429466fe3b10e6768a1628b67ffc7f18c391
current source binding
input hash
0ba0b33ebacbb48b48332add049c20060168c63780f3aa6a6a66fe8d2f7550c3
decision id
d2d16aca3fc5e9b8d23699365aa73f0985b3b280a1ee1b1096d61be7577b9727
document id
75dbb8866865799144686cbb4d197d4dd5fecd0a38d8f3f3ca211a6fd95d40bd
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
c82901fe894328442e4e74c96d7e6ab8da48a755a36ca285caede746a8788ed1
finding evidence sha256
dfca23abb5b41e3611c7b9336f0e494521f8ef25b1837ef2bf1d79f8bafd3cde
enrichment payload sha256
ec5e1a249c7275c70a3e1b2b09fd8cb53379a49173ff2bbe68dd4816bd3a1444
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/75dbb8866865799144686cbb4d197d4dd5fecd0a38d8f3f3ca211a6fd95d40bd/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
797871c1afbe4801c585b8049a694587b947a6860aa94b82d7d084d384e2e793

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 75dbb8866865799144686cbb4d197d4dd5fecd0a38d8f3f3ca211a6fd95d40bd
Decision: d2d16aca3fc5e9b8d23699365aa73f0985b3b280a1ee1b1096d61be7577b9727
Base reviewed revision: 38b5808228db39ba1a88153acdb4429466fe3b10e6768a1628b67ffc7f18c391

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.