Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

TikTokで知り合い、ロマンス詐欺 由利本荘の50代女性、170万被害|秋田魁新報電子版

www.sakigake.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-20
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Police attribute a1.7million-yen loss to a Yurihonjo woman in her50s; TikTok meeting is stated in the own title. Romance-topic eligibility is not an independently detailed fabricated relationship. Police attribution alone supplies no investigation/arrest, refund or calendar year.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
The saved snippet does not describe false affection/persona details or police procedure beyond an announcement, and the numbered day has no explicit year.
subject
the source-described woman in her50s
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Reported loss and own target location; no added payment mechanism or suspect identity.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
f419c9eb6e5575be5278f0642bb8b122208e73458ea7229894c8f4c7eb84c809
current source binding
input hash
fe4fc098b68f9dcd2c26ea0dd4668c9c8f082f1f10ca999746c058f60ad043b9
decision id
746203e092da2789bd9964ec4eea4d0cf032db19881a79f41d58d287e491fd26
document id
806d2875c5157829769b4b8eed966f5039819202ed93771504040297a6917c00
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
aea31c9969e4cc846eed7d0a599d5ef95642ecc27953acab5cb9ab847a675de8
finding evidence sha256
bcb6dd32525f1e756ba0fdfb29afe602b3cbdec69d2a68927d44e048b1e78478
enrichment payload sha256
8e04d0365fad5d1db98b54403445c76211b5ab4913883bcc5cbf03fec949ebf6
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/806d2875c5157829769b4b8eed966f5039819202ed93771504040297a6917c00/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
38efa2ff5e41473cbb16b2c697f60c1b908ea15e0699f6e089cde38bf83ce319

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 806d2875c5157829769b4b8eed966f5039819202ed93771504040297a6917c00
Decision: 746203e092da2789bd9964ec4eea4d0cf032db19881a79f41d58d287e491fd26
Base reviewed revision: f419c9eb6e5575be5278f0642bb8b122208e73458ea7229894c8f4c7eb84c809

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.