Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

莫淂发:诈骗手法变化多端 勿信高回酬投资广告 | 南马 | 地方

www.orientaldaily.com.myChineseObserved 2024-06-04
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Official offers warnings about multiple fraud types. The player’s逾40万令吉 belongs to the investment example; no romance-only allocation or diagnosis from persistent belief.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
The player’s逾40万令吉 belongs to the investment example; no romance-only allocation or diagnosis from persistent belief.
subject
莫淂发
subject basis
own_explicit_name
reported outcome
Official offers warnings about multiple fraud types.
subject name literals
Item 1
莫淂发
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
6a7be72f1849aa03bf59a04f67fe83a6178baf9f0e380800d98d29c5dc33d949
current source binding
input hash
a3cfcb19af873d9611b0939c0f3f64e904cd6b956ac6c65fd71e8ae5f6f5115a
decision id
5cccc5a602a98023bfe02ab698c30725f4e7b35fe54aa55e4e5ee874df3f64b8
document id
82ce27f32e0f9f16e9450d5d3a8971d5aac8472f324afc5187572122c9aa5c97
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
885eecbb0342ffd99afd3a67570a6231b03ee745cf09984da300bf1732815fdb
finding evidence sha256
ca06248ab977e2186845df1198e4513a5330a133b9c4dee6abb2eff4f15cf078
enrichment payload sha256
412fbb19b188d7d7486b7415bf12dbd183a1bbfbaad04414e4e4cb7df9f13ae1
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/82ce27f32e0f9f16e9450d5d3a8971d5aac8472f324afc5187572122c9aa5c97/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
85b7bbe0250fe71ab6487383adb5565ec9c8fbebdb4af06ddce77a7fca2680cc

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
mixed fraud
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
mixed scheme
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 82ce27f32e0f9f16e9450d5d3a8971d5aac8472f324afc5187572122c9aa5c97
Decision: 5cccc5a602a98023bfe02ab698c30725f4e7b35fe54aa55e4e5ee874df3f64b8
Base reviewed revision: 6a7be72f1849aa03bf59a04f67fe83a6178baf9f0e380800d98d29c5dc33d949

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.