Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

La víctima de la estafa amorosa del 'falso Brad Pitt' pide 14 años de cárcel para los cabecillas | Ideal

www.ideal.esSpanishObserved 2026-10-14
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

ROOT own-source correction: Own complete metadata says only false profiles, without an explicit digital method or platform communication. Impersonation remains reported as alleged; the technology code requires more specific own evidence and is held as insufficient context. Original authored context, retained without its superseded positive application: Own Ideal title requests14years; own description alleges314000euros taken from two women by a criminal plot using fake profiles. Code only those own details, not an imposed sentence or inferred new crimes from matching reporting. All24 individually reviewed.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

notes
The own victim locations Granada and País Vasco are not in the candidate gazetteer; a country is therefore not silently normalized. Outlet/domain, currency and agency author provide no separate country-role basis. Fourteen years is requested only. No explicit incident/procedural date appears; the publication timestamp supplies neither. No case union with similar URLs is made.
context kind
FILE-derived DATE20 notes and unknown-role qualifications
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; no native SQL producer, country inference, case identity or new semantic review.
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
country.victim
Item 5
date.incident
Item 6
date.procedural
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

source specific current qualifications

note
ROOT own-source correction: Own complete metadata says only false profiles, without an explicit digital method or platform communication. Impersonation remains reported as alleged; the technology code requires more specific own evidence and is held as insufficient context. Original authored context, retained without its superseded positive application: Own Ideal title requests14years; own description alleges314000euros taken from two women by a criminal plot using fake profiles. Code only those own details, not an imposed sentence or inferred new crimes from matching reporting. All24 individually reviewed.
context kind
FILE-derived ALL24 review notes and explicit denials
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; an empty denial list adds no denial and changes no code state.
changes to explicit denials
No listed value
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
reported_loss
reason
Ideal's own description alleges €314,000 taken from two women through false profiles. Its title's requested prison term is not evidence that any term was imposed or served.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
2d11ba54f094db812f77b8c058025668e31138c08f9e048654c1d31204bc0b88
current source binding
input hash
644bb3b8409ca61b1a245303511577a1d6e5d0691ec50ec346594d84ee82279c
decision id
d32787ddfaea9ebcddda804295cd64bb80966fba048e6eb0edeaf8cece005cae
document id
aab801d0f2319c41472615be95070a2f932debf25e368b41f9b4f668d128d26f
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e2518ac3a773b7be1cd39b13b877d7a4b1dea8558627909ff1402943ca651b53
finding evidence sha256
766b63ba069a0c114e8d6afe5bc863a7dd5ada0684463901fcd7917ede0ac988
enrichment payload sha256
48edc1520747c7c16b048c59308263b1aacfd03ebb6e74300c1d3a6b7df6e285
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/selected_file_bindings/aab801d0f2319c41472615be95070a2f932debf25e368b41f9b4f668d128d26f
artifact sha256
8697f0f4c180f298bab15d1d5da1db0f6d446f1702f9ccd542cb1a7b73742dab
annotation key
6f0dd1f47a4e320cb422ef094f3e11e73b1f30710792896315370915406b67df

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

sentencereported occurrenceStage: requested
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Organization and division of labor

networkallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of laborreported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: aab801d0f2319c41472615be95070a2f932debf25e368b41f9b4f668d128d26f
Decision: d32787ddfaea9ebcddda804295cd64bb80966fba048e6eb0edeaf8cece005cae
Base reviewed revision: 2d11ba54f094db812f77b8c058025668e31138c08f9e048654c1d31204bc0b88

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.