Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Son ex était un "arnacœur"… Elle lui prête 104 000 euros mais il se débrouille pour organiser son insolvabilité et ne pas la rembourser

www.ladepeche.frFrenchObserved 2024-08-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Farah43/104000EUR loan to believednewboyfriend/arnaquesentimentale/nonrepayment and claimedarrangedinsolvency. Moneyloss throughallegedfalseintimacy, nottargetborroweddebt, provencriminalintent/otheroffence, actualassetrecovery or courtoutcome. Columerin refersmale nottargetresidence/operationbase; noyear/clinicalharm/refund inferred.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Farah43/104000EUR loan to believednewboyfriend/arnaquesentimentale/nonrepayment and claimedarrangedinsolvency. Moneyloss throughallegedfalseintimacy, nottargetborroweddebt, provencriminalintent/otheroffence, actualassetrecovery or courtoutcome. Columerin refersmale nottargetresidence/operationbase; noyear/clinicalharm/refund inferred.
subject
Aug05_unit_36
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
a12b3f996a98e141e2d7419ab22bcde1a6c30fba198d53b2bd8f3da78d0fa84a
current source binding
input hash
8296b79257090523ad23c58e7f79ec25057ebfd888b7a78d74cbb05512be944f
decision id
40c8ddbad1a058cc2190cc492a65878d95be3554b843a14749df5a9ff4f092c0
document id
aacfc7db87591e44f7d0789eea89a76a95f1484c62977b78316fa24561a78fe9
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
a8a0cc03ebc50541983ba288123c026b071f5241620519f4ef308dbc37b43319
finding evidence sha256
87323e9fec3fbdc2e548dd4351f5ea7d5710b7c10f1c28bccf8126ec288eee63
enrichment payload sha256
9ac2ed5e5432fa01e8ef082ee8af95e3b12e1c8110677135dc99b951f34f3560
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/aacfc7db87591e44f7d0789eea89a76a95f1484c62977b78316fa24561a78fe9/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
a966e50287eab02377bc284d565cf5344ccd4cc2e3f329161efd99d10b1a601c

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesinsufficient context
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendinginsufficient context
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: aacfc7db87591e44f7d0789eea89a76a95f1484c62977b78316fa24561a78fe9
Decision: 40c8ddbad1a058cc2190cc492a65878d95be3554b843a14749df5a9ff4f092c0
Base reviewed revision: a12b3f996a98e141e2d7419ab22bcde1a6c30fba198d53b2bd8f3da78d0fa84a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.