Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「私の叔父が金の投資でもうけている」 60代男性が445万円詐取される | 西日本新聞me

www.nishinippon.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-08-26
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Hiji60male445manRomanceinvestment/unclegoldprofitclaim, notactualuncleprofits/crypto/clinicalharm/eventyear.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Hiji60male445manRomanceinvestment/unclegoldprofitclaim, notactualuncleprofits/crypto/clinicalharm/eventyear.
subject
Aug26_unit_55
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
92575632ca7b683f247b90c5af94c2b419206efb8388651be4fc50cef934ef7b
current source binding
input hash
7bf613b4a8464665f0890c820fdeeed610ada8d6384cabe94cf5a773939fddd2
decision id
9c9c889ed2e3d10f7e1adaffde4afb6ef2e9ccbccfcf701750cb2ee13bb8c973
document id
b0fe20923fb7facb4253b1810877f656c5047ced0bef35c2ca82f799943dd119
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
b388cd46975248615031b1019c4998e7e20f9fbcf9bbe709d2367301c0e909b1
finding evidence sha256
84b09d780f14b1b424a2229e105e31103e55b3b73033f3a41d75b6c2ff9e1666
enrichment payload sha256
897a1928125d582952ab0c01706dd7d17f451cd12669131f8608fe089f60362f
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/b0fe20923fb7facb4253b1810877f656c5047ced0bef35c2ca82f799943dd119/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
1e1a1b9738c1a5eb87c43d978e7219b16ea3709d4a4b6378ada4bb855769884e

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

promised returnsallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: b0fe20923fb7facb4253b1810877f656c5047ced0bef35c2ca82f799943dd119
Decision: 9c9c889ed2e3d10f7e1adaffde4afb6ef2e9ccbccfcf701750cb2ee13bb8c973
Base reviewed revision: 92575632ca7b683f247b90c5af94c2b419206efb8388651be4fc50cef934ef7b

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.