Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

Love Scamming Marak, Jaringan Penipuan Melalui Asmara, Waspada Uang dan Cinta Melayang! - Harian Haluan

www.harianhaluan.comIndonesianObserved 2024-07-27
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Indonesian warning explicitly links romantic deception to money and love being lost. Treat money as general warning, not observed payment or quantity; clipped claimed excuses do not supply fabricated-persona details or a verified network despite Jaringan in the headline.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Indonesian warning explicitly links romantic deception to money and love being lost. Treat money as general warning, not observed payment or quantity; clipped claimed excuses do not supply fabricated-persona details or a verified network despite Jaringan in the headline.
subject
own_romantic_fraud_money_loss_warning
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
warning_scope_not_actual_loss_or_verified_network
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
8ebf552b8a665591ef407579e4a27164269cccfcbcc6ccd28928290fe8bf79c7
current source binding
input hash
82ce6a082ab894ceb41dcbc50fd0363c256d713a6904abfed297788af41d33a0
decision id
3194992bf64b0edcd2a1f53923401b6b6e45cc9d88b6751687d4d233c6671338
document id
b77db7779a750a39f6ba56f861d2562dd606eacc23e26de858fc29a3e04a4767
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
4e1942231f29e9d6aedb0d12c858f4c3bda5b3536335f7e5551cb1f97d032cbc
finding evidence sha256
06d997f6b6f8261fbca8efe0d8eddb116d46e13087667669a42ce4ada9a2fb41
enrichment payload sha256
260ef9bb82e3a4470cd4771df2781a8f7bf2cfdcbf4cde226e85077567367774
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/b77db7779a750a39f6ba56f861d2562dd606eacc23e26de858fc29a3e04a4767/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
757f9fc35e446ec4a081b6a622122927c2b50b15b8e4bbb04689dd647d9188ca

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Financial and property harm

cashgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of laborinsufficient context
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: b77db7779a750a39f6ba56f861d2562dd606eacc23e26de858fc29a3e04a4767
Decision: 3194992bf64b0edcd2a1f53923401b6b6e45cc9d88b6751687d4d233c6671338
Base reviewed revision: 8ebf552b8a665591ef407579e4a27164269cccfcbcc6ccd28928290fe8bf79c7

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.