Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Local woman who lost £85k to fraudster shares story to raise awareness of fraud

www.yorkpress.co.ukEnglishObserved 2025-10-09
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

NorthYorkshire romance-fraud victim reportsGBP85,000loss and shares her story to help others. Two headline variants describe disclosure/awareness, not necessarily KirstyBelmontGBP90,000 without a named bridge or an actual recovery.

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United Kingdom

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

disclosurereported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

North Yorkshire woman who lost £85k to fraudster shares her story

Two matching NorthYorkshire85,000-loss/report-sharing openings support repeated coverage. NamedKirstyBelmont90,000 and genericmum85,000 are possible but lack shared name/amount/place bridges in the short contexts; no silent85-to90 correction or combined personal identity.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: b78509a36a8d5479b9fb7cd0732da76f3ddbf287bbb697901f33134683bcd1ac
Decision: 04b4e10ae6fd391c191f496460a6c1569ae8d4b460d1cc0c1d7044752f0166a4
Current revision: 57b7d2fb443c6617fcbcf6f48b68a0fa36d736878d93fa487453b1f730399250

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.