Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Own report concerns Luo, a falsely claimed million-follower influencer and marriage/dating fraud. The title alleges more than120000yuan; the description explicitly reports a Hongqiao court fraud conviction, three years eight months imprisonment and an RMB30000 fine. The fine is not victim compensation or actual refund, and is not added to the alleged loss. No served term, finality, explicit event year or genuine influencer identity is inferred.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Procedural context
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific procedural contexts
field
desc
reason
Own report concerns Luo, a falsely claimed million-follower influencer and marriage/dating fraud. The title alleges more than120000yuan; the description explicitly reports a Hongqiao court fraud conviction, three years eight months imprisonment and an RMB30000 fine. The fine is not victim compensation or actual refund, and is not added to the alleged loss. No served term, finality, explicit event year or genuine influencer identity is inferred.
subject
own defendant Luo
subject basis
own_explicit_name
reported outcome
reported fraud conviction, imposed three-year-eight-month prison term and RMB30000 fine
subject name literals
Item 1
罗某
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
title
reason
Own report concerns Luo, a falsely claimed million-follower influencer and marriage/dating fraud. The title alleges more than120000yuan; the description explicitly reports a Hongqiao court fraud conviction, three years eight months imprisonment and an RMB30000 fine. The fine is not victim compensation or actual refund, and is not added to the alleged loss. No served term, finality, explicit event year or genuine influencer identity is inferred.
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
sentence
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: be0047e4f1b263515ba7e60bd21d059e99c49382852c9db186763b2e507d934d Decision: d02ae4aa2ad4eb6fc5e41f757b612840c3ea3b2dc5054d8aed45ee177228afe7 Base reviewed revision: 51a30baf524c3f90f37246ea2c7157457148923c5e462bce65ee5f3ef8c1d716
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.