Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

El fiscal que lucha contra ciberdelitos en Sevilla: «He tomado declaración a personas convencidas de que Brad Pitt o Diane Kruger les hablan»

www.abc.esSpanishObserved 2024-10-06
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own prosecutorGabrielGonzalez warning foreigncelebrity romanticimpersonation. Generalstatement not actualnamedcase/realactor wrongdoing/clinicalcause orprecise calendar.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
e9348b00dcdd0841a01cbbd80a6a16a8db0738995831881087b796a7dec50b92
current source binding
input hash
1d9dc4163e1dec64d9ea5c48987c2c7ae56defd926b21715f320618d302bd246
decision id
31077eab979866484aca44b3475e172a623910f5a9830d0b184d9d202e1e24c6
document id
ce13b0eb780b77e415791e609890e916169156d71c8a12e21c386010f1f4f860
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e3905f064dfd741c6e1f2565ac65d7b527086ea09427e68aba07549760910c26
finding evidence sha256
9326e6d8ffa3edb97f0ad1820b620ae09f0d1f8f29cb042f72586472a6509f4f
enrichment payload sha256
e832d10258b538b89e5ad241d8c20095c79b9cb142629ad64c68c18a393051df
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/ce13b0eb780b77e415791e609890e916169156d71c8a12e21c386010f1f4f860/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
91edd27833acecf5b1dab62937f713e7af87c01138d58b9d757d77e710d9b245

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: ce13b0eb780b77e415791e609890e916169156d71c8a12e21c386010f1f4f860
Decision: 31077eab979866484aca44b3475e172a623910f5a9830d0b184d9d202e1e24c6
Base reviewed revision: e9348b00dcdd0841a01cbbd80a6a16a8db0738995831881087b796a7dec50b92

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.