Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

Liebesbetrug mit "Rosenheim-Cops"

www.stern.deGermanObserved 2024-07-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Stern excerpt reports authorities counted450 Internet Liebesbetrug cases in Bavaria in the previous year with5.3millionEUR damage. Preserve the regional aggregate/source denominator, generic Internet method and relative period, without converting previous year to a calendar year or assigning the total to one Rosenheim-Cops incident. Detailed deception, independent incidence and individual justice stages remain unspecified.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Germany

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Stern excerpt reports authorities counted450 Internet Liebesbetrug cases in Bavaria in the previous year with5.3millionEUR damage. Preserve the regional aggregate/source denominator, generic Internet method and relative period, without converting previous year to a calendar year or assigning the total to one Rosenheim-Cops incident. Detailed deception, independent incidence and individual justice stages remain unspecified.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own source scope/stage/inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
efdda114affc8bde5f2e4b64ccc460e82e620beb4ba8208e7154090284f63f34
current source binding
input hash
3d0a2a1b3ba6e7066abaead5448f13d92aaa152d76a73ab40de1b12be7d155c6
decision id
007dfda6577f5199a55366032cfe0ff6b7b538c0181e83ea7b04d2c90ef5b2b6
document id
d287583415b4ee3960935547ebe493075db6b13e4afe827d1c0ea3f5d8107948
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
a6330ab102af2ed5efeb254c3c952bacda29695cc4cbffb334032206987cdc7c
finding evidence sha256
1e75f8df5454257309fdca63bc58e0a5fb068781123e565884dda6a4b4f6f1b0
enrichment payload sha256
ca938d9eae58a11dcd5c1f4cfafb1a8f45db8b9d8d2ebf54d37fc2c712240c8a
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/d287583415b4ee3960935547ebe493075db6b13e4afe827d1c0ea3f5d8107948/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
2dec2999b82925761b87e8922e0ebac5c5bd4f65facdad1d7a31a60714675747

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
multiple cases
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: d287583415b4ee3960935547ebe493075db6b13e4afe827d1c0ea3f5d8107948
Decision: 007dfda6577f5199a55366032cfe0ff6b7b538c0181e83ea7b04d2c90ef5b2b6
Base reviewed revision: efdda114affc8bde5f2e4b64ccc460e82e620beb4ba8208e7154090284f63f34

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.