Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

New York AG Sounds Alarm on "Pig Butchering" Romance Scams

wibx950.comEnglishObserved 2024-01-26–2024-06-07
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Each of these five URLs has the same own full title and description: a New York attorney-general warning about pig-butchering romance scams and a claimed billions-wide scheme. The amount is an unverified aggregate without currency, period or case denominator; it is not five independent losses or proven all-Romance incidence. The typo Letitia Jams remains the saved spelling. No investment details are borrowed from fuller warning articles.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United States

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Each of these five URLs has the same own full title and description: a New York attorney-general warning about pig-butchering romance scams and a claimed billions-wide scheme. The amount is an unverified aggregate without currency, period or case denominator; it is not five independent losses or proven all-Romance incidence. The typo Letitia Jams remains the saved spelling. No investment details are borrowed from fuller warning articles.
subject
own reported source subjects
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
bounded own-source interpretation; unsupported facts withheld
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
e4b8e8666b7cd690405ec66e0ab9369203b5a17ca29d9c0c9bc26e13a68b063a
current source binding
input hash
672eaf007c00ad9c6f9cf91c1bb39d9999013376a343521ef7209090d83e278b
decision id
507a388f974f3fb94faa1413f8fb9395e6d8372b04b0374d0a169da2a5438496
document id
d30f53b2f827c0735a327fb3f601f4030dfd1b084333bf154dfad44a62baca01
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
f5194e55d0ae7fd6056a68abe0c314d4e5b72c79cfd040b050e5a5ab0611ed38
finding evidence sha256
787849ab2a4c29472aaee3e99d2e2589df821f3a72b1f022fe09c444471317d0
enrichment payload sha256
c9a85995de0c475d431c179296909f714c705de54f48c9f5b7056c8979b229c5
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/d30f53b2f827c0735a327fb3f601f4030dfd1b084333bf154dfad44a62baca01/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
97d18e203b36042f362effc61c9348c95686fc0633ac04ba600faf37a54ef9e1

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: d30f53b2f827c0735a327fb3f601f4030dfd1b084333bf154dfad44a62baca01
Decision: 507a388f974f3fb94faa1413f8fb9395e6d8372b04b0374d0a169da2a5438496
Base reviewed revision: e4b8e8666b7cd690405ec66e0ab9369203b5a17ca29d9c0c9bc26e13a68b063a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.