Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Dating fraudsters use fake banks to con woman out of £80K

www.bbc.comEnglishObserved 2024-08-21
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own floristKirstyNorthYorkshire80KGBP fake-bankdating sourceclaim. Fakebanknotactualbankmisconduct/refund/technicalwebsiteformat/clinicaldiagnosis/country/year.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: United Kingdom

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own floristKirstyNorthYorkshire80KGBP fake-bankdating sourceclaim. Fakebanknotactualbankmisconduct/refund/technicalwebsiteformat/clinicaldiagnosis/country/year.
subject
Aug19_unit_26
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
177afc003d37473d6cb61052fc3f97c232af455931e6571b729d683411ed3d0a
current source binding
input hash
1d8ccd0f84bb80bf623e4d67006534a7942c00d5ba6b95c9e414affcf25ce2e1
decision id
c6c89f6f492f4cde46d0d699a6aa474f46b4b73291e57de8e35fd74613f67e9c
document id
dd8c8ad2931a7a299448b1ebc4c9071f178f3688f40253e14e5de64a83cc912b
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
c9cdb3fda044e7fc491940449359a5b727f48c2bf0cfe3d5dbafab1a6712364c
finding evidence sha256
67dc1fd1c7d2d31686ad48a53bb252be6cfc0daa3316f880c550abf0a4b48e65
enrichment payload sha256
670ce14fe2cd9178de96b59d90dbd49833f0f60561a8548cea7a535d25c1f8b2
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/dd8c8ad2931a7a299448b1ebc4c9071f178f3688f40253e14e5de64a83cc912b/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
efa442335316fa4e14cf3daeee5b97bd3acd7627ba8be6184174767580b3c81d

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responseinsufficient context
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

Dating fraudsters use fake banks to con woman out of £80K

Two exact rare Kirsty florist/NorthYorkshire80000GBP/fakebanks dating-fraud title-lead contexts support bounded reporting-work family. Amount not added twice, fake bank not actual institution misconduct or proven website format; no refund, diagnosis or event year borrowed.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: dd8c8ad2931a7a299448b1ebc4c9071f178f3688f40253e14e5de64a83cc912b
Decision: c6c89f6f492f4cde46d0d699a6aa474f46b4b73291e57de8e35fd74613f67e9c
Base reviewed revision: 177afc003d37473d6cb61052fc3f97c232af455931e6571b729d683411ed3d0a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.