Financial and property harm
cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- mixed fraud
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- mixed scheme
- Causal claim
- not established
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
SNS型投資詐欺とロマンス詐欺のダブルパンチか 50代の男性会社員が現金約5600万円と暗号資産約1300万円相当をだまし取られる=静岡県警｜静岡新聞アットエス
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Shizuoka headline reports a man in his fifties losing approximatelyJPY56million cash and13million crypto in a possible combined SNS investment and romance scam. Description explicitly calls the cash loss stock-investment contact and truncates at matchingapp. Retain mixed attributed financial claim and titlecrypto payment, not all69million assigned to romance or a proved double-scam identity. Fuji appears in description; no arrest or diagnosis.
Places in the available evidence
Victim location: Japan
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Technical facilitation
crypto transferreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- mixed fraud
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- mixed scheme
- Causal claim
- not established
Technical facilitation
platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- mixed fraud
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- mixed scheme
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | insufficient context |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | insufficient context |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | not reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: eb7ca429a791980dae2891b6f2fb04dd2a718cb690dceff7fea3c833ec2f69b6
Decision: 08c92ed4826236c8c93a0ae35d0a6671c8479fd599ca6f6e800b215d514f4d07
Current revision: 2d205cab5bc732db6524504e322454b18cc07746b922308b826cbdfbb6d41d9f
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.