Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

【速報】京都で過去最大のロマンス詐欺被害 79歳会社役員男性、計1億5900万円だまし取られる

www.47news.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-12-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own KyotoNishikyo79male investment/SNS loss159.5m paragraph vs159m headline andRomance investigation. Rounding/sourceamount distinct,10th noyear, no actual foreignidentity or crypto-payment.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
investigation
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
cbeaaa8128a77df50c803dc2e1607f4e78453dd3639eddbeaa54c0afefade24c
current source binding
input hash
2221426d443edd9e9da076d7b5ee37f17a9d90592f8eec0d5fb3d98a94c9e13e
decision id
df9331d4b7b809372a4cd9258dbc81a5991ab2d9ad33a8e08665bd919163f12a
document id
f111cd392cb7933acf930f929bea393a7ada1fd70041706afbfd6cdbf33a7496
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
1b824ca6fea992984935b183be712d2695c8235622fa3a961bf2b464edd00666
finding evidence sha256
40b4354a4e7dd94c086bc1f32ab7551f6de4f27c346e3a830b9047e842f44507
enrichment payload sha256
55892be69150fd0f4ff0af81c4f0a7f8e7f10c895f10ddb632a1a0b53112caba
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/f111cd392cb7933acf930f929bea393a7ada1fd70041706afbfd6cdbf33a7496/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
8310ff5ddbbd5dba8873ec98474cc2bcff707b35e00f87f28ca682101b13050b

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investigation and operational response

investigationreported occurrenceStage: unclear
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsereported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: f111cd392cb7933acf930f929bea393a7ada1fd70041706afbfd6cdbf33a7496
Decision: df9331d4b7b809372a4cd9258dbc81a5991ab2d9ad33a8e08665bd919163f12a
Base reviewed revision: cbeaaa8128a77df50c803dc2e1607f4e78453dd3639eddbeaa54c0afefade24c

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.