Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「何を信用していいのか…」ロマンス詐欺で140万円失い、弁護士にも金をだまし取られて:中日新聞Web

www.chunichi.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-09-05
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own140manJPY Romance loss then attorney fee deception/second harm; source general recovery difficulty and quote what-to-trust distress/distrust. No clinical diagnosis/actualrefund/paidfeeamount/name borrowed, providerbarrier attribution not judicial misconduct.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own140manJPY Romance loss then attorney fee deception/second harm; source general recovery difficulty and quote what-to-trust distress/distrust. No clinical diagnosis/actualrefund/paidfeeamount/name borrowed, providerbarrier attribution not judicial misconduct.
subject
Sep02_unit_29
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
e7960e33aeb7d82256841296e25af6cbd73b66f2c552ae8f8db678af59434557
current source binding
input hash
b271c1fe27af8349a391f226f3ce26cbd371f6cc3260ba3a532e91517242d99c
decision id
dd3e847226f53d71b1cd78d564f9879d4619a1ce968f7bf2e687d233e5c44add
document id
f5a04e62501e65df8cf6cdff86177fb1c545ee1737b4f9ca5ea958d216d35fbb
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
f05264b3453c1ff78adf097c94f5cae70659474071d280a026850a0426de5b62
finding evidence sha256
13c54bf294701aa0394ea97491561fdd99d3d132d76ce159a199cfe82996e050
enrichment payload sha256
95160a03af77582aab82c97c9919b183ed212fad549f401bde44d0da53e687f3
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/f5a04e62501e65df8cf6cdff86177fb1c545ee1737b4f9ca5ea958d216d35fbb/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
904feac4a2c0540b47cfc8d2347cbf9b454af20c6641e7350b8e883dbf103628

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Continued or renewed targeting

recovery scamreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Institutional barriers or harmful response

barrierreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
support provider
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Psychological distress

distrustreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsinsufficient context
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressreported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingreported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsereported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: f5a04e62501e65df8cf6cdff86177fb1c545ee1737b4f9ca5ea958d216d35fbb
Decision: dd3e847226f53d71b1cd78d564f9879d4619a1ce968f7bf2e687d233e5c44add
Base reviewed revision: e7960e33aeb7d82256841296e25af6cbd73b66f2c552ae8f8db678af59434557

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.