Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

极目调查丨母亲介绍的“高富帅”设下“杀猪盘”:女子10天内被骗122万元,80多万元都是借的,两人甚至没见过面,案件今日开审

www.163.comChineseObserved 2026-10-14
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own title and repeated-title/tag description report the mother-introduced purported rich man, never met, 1.22 million lost, more than 800,000 borrowed and a trial opening today. No gold or investment website appears in this own copy. Code cash loss, debt, unspecified relationship-mediated deception and planned trial; withhold investment detail. Do not borrow crying or public-disclosure acts from another URL.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

notes
No country or named court location appears; Chinese language, mother-introduction narrative, currency and outlet do not establish roles. '今日' is a relative trial reference, not an explicit calendar date; publication cannot supply it under this unchanged DATE20 contract. Ten days is duration. The article title's investigation label is journalistic, not proof of a separate police action. Other apparently related URLs add no facts.
context kind
FILE-derived DATE20 notes and unknown-role qualifications
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; no native SQL producer, country inference, case identity or new semantic review.
unknown roles
Item 1
country.jurisdiction
Item 2
country.operation
Item 3
country.publisher
Item 4
country.victim
Item 5
date.incident
Item 6
date.procedural
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

source specific current qualifications

note
Own title and repeated-title/tag description report the mother-introduced purported rich man, never met, 1.22 million lost, more than 800,000 borrowed and a trial opening today. No gold or investment website appears in this own copy. Code cash loss, debt, unspecified relationship-mediated deception and planned trial; withhold investment detail. Do not borrow crying or public-disclosure acts from another URL.
context kind
FILE-derived ALL24 review notes and explicit denials
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; an empty denial list adds no denial and changes no code state.
changes to explicit denials
No listed value
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
reported_loss
reason
The own title reports 1.22 million defrauded in ten days, over 800,000 borrowed, in a mother-introduced matchmaking account. This is an attributed loss account, not independently verified finances.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
trial
reason
The own title expressly says the case opens for trial today. Opening a trial does not establish conviction or a sentence.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
06653a418e75b7a982160bb3af6b339252c34bb5279d2c929cc6662910bdbb40
current source binding
input hash
9ef895d3669363f3aedd5674b4a15045ca6e657505f73d4f768380c12f595c24
decision id
81ab747a446a454d2b13a81fe6988538c5f54cfb05e6dddbca5110ba420e5f4b
document id
f7a4d8a6c91227142b97c988a3354ba370cde969af54d0095e83102c8c863346
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
74e56a94d8e6e2cd34d7c766264dddfd187b6fe8fff7b8a02ca6d10e29fb612a
finding evidence sha256
5254a82e22b2c5974399586b98b5c5f2e4e7163614ed28e71a819e3b61b6e9d1
enrichment payload sha256
3d9dcaa1428178d42624dfcb229298e43265d46e1155e36d4f93f08f86feac8c
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/selected_file_bindings/f7a4d8a6c91227142b97c988a3354ba370cde969af54d0095e83102c8c863346
artifact sha256
8697f0f4c180f298bab15d1d5da1db0f6d446f1702f9ccd542cb1a7b73742dab
annotation key
d9c646d3be1543de03afab20bf8387826906ec69acc3d20238d0d532fbbecd69

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Financial and property harm

debt or financial disruptionreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

trialreported occurrenceStage: planned
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: f7a4d8a6c91227142b97c988a3354ba370cde969af54d0095e83102c8c863346
Decision: 81ab747a446a454d2b13a81fe6988538c5f54cfb05e6dddbca5110ba420e5f4b
Base reviewed revision: 06653a418e75b7a982160bb3af6b339252c34bb5279d2c929cc6662910bdbb40

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.