Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「頂き女子」判決不服として控訴|北日本新聞webunプラス

webun.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-05-01
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Webun clipping lacks9year term,8million fine, dates and other woman’s conviction. Do not add them despite related coverage; no served time or country inferred.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

code
response.justice
text
詐欺罪などに問われた
reason
Historical fraud-charge context; current reported appeal is a separate development.
subtype
charge
dimensions
scope
single_case
stage
completed
stance
not_applicable
speaker
reporter
causality
not_established
scam link
explicit
actor role
alleged_offender
statement type
reported_occurrence
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
subject basis
Exact listed own admitted development judgments; distinct subjects/stages remain distinct.
reported outcome
Item 1
stage
reported_filed
limits
No term length, fine, age, dates or appeal outcome imported from related reports.
subject
source defendant
original authored application
code
response.justice
note
Historical fraud-charge context; current reported appeal is a separate development.
scope
single_case
stage
completed
stance
not_applicable
speaker
reporter
subtype
charge
causality
not_established
scam link
explicit
actor role
alleged_offender
statement type
reported_occurrence
original compiled application
code
response.justice
alias
direct_literal/response.justice/charge
scope
single_case
stage
completed
stance
not_applicable
speaker
reporter
subtype
charge
group id
W20240429_20240505G025
causality
not_established
record id
W20240429_20240505C0088
scam link
explicit
actor role
alleged_offender
decision id
f24b671f2c9db4b62a4d322ba9979959df71093a141ce262e78aecea497988fc
document id
fa7e8ff248ca4aa55da70e7b95883b10b768f6ee5ad544f1db2dd38dcb51a823
application id
W20240429_20240505A00081
interpretation
Historical fraud-charge context; current reported appeal is a separate development.
statement type
reported_occurrence
source truth verified
false
admitted development judgments
Item 1
result
No listed value
original candidate
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
commentary
reason
Original custom development: appeal. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_filed. Appeal has no exact event; the short own source supplies no sentence length, fine or appellate result. Own-source rationale: This own title reports appeal even though its description is clipped. Retained limits: No term length, fine, age, dates or appeal outcome imported from related reports.
validated assertion
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
commentary
reason
Original custom development: appeal. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_filed. Appeal has no exact event; the short own source supplies no sentence length, fine or appellate result. Own-source rationale: This own title reports appeal even though its description is clipped. Retained limits: No term length, fine, age, dates or appeal outcome imported from related reports.
exact retained field
title
exact retained stage
reported_filed
exact retained limits
No term length, fine, age, dates or appeal outcome imported from related reports.
exact retained subject
source defendant
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
original dimensions preserved not new attribution approval
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Own Webun clipping lacks9year term,8million fine, dates and other woman’s conviction. Do not add them despite related coverage; no served time or country inferred.
field
interpretation
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
own role source layer limits
own actors
Item 1
note
Clipped defendant wording; no age borrowed.
role
alleged_offender
actor
Mai Watanabe/Riri
Item 2
note
No exact count supplied.
role
targeted_person
actor
men
analytical note
Own Webun clipping lacks9year term,8million fine, dates and other woman’s conviction. Do not add them despite related coverage; no served time or country inferred.
reported developments
Item 1
note
No sentence length/finality inferred from other reports.
stage
reported_filed
subject
defendant
development
appeal
own country role proposals
No listed value
explicit calendar year bounds
No listed value
exact ROOT qualified record note
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
commentary
reason
Original custom development: appeal. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_filed. Appeal has no exact event; the short own source supplies no sentence length, fine or appellate result. Own-source rationale: This own title reports appeal even though its description is clipped. Retained limits: No term length, fine, age, dates or appeal outcome imported from related reports.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
6aeb7100faffe5ac14caa2e42b17e22122c41fbe46832c1c36a5514fd350dbf5
current source binding
input hash
01f66f25c66861974ce0b41407daa28111b34c1f23445a6ecd63993882834d03
decision id
f24b671f2c9db4b62a4d322ba9979959df71093a141ce262e78aecea497988fc
document id
fa7e8ff248ca4aa55da70e7b95883b10b768f6ee5ad544f1db2dd38dcb51a823
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
37ad3b8ebaa933893de61b77f68063118957aaff21842b7d38ee99329ccd1f53
finding evidence sha256
397a2bfb3879c4c60e8f9df8d4557c7f35c5dd305c486ffad2ad643488a0da35
enrichment payload sha256
934c79b26b22e89982413d4a7ec65cfe77c34a2f86820f15db2722b4942af296
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/fa7e8ff248ca4aa55da70e7b95883b10b768f6ee5ad544f1db2dd38dcb51a823/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
466a8d4659b2ab1056ce27da1587c906168e2162fc64cd8e01781fb6338751a7

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed

Own approximate155million alleged total, no components.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates

Justice proceedings and outcomes

chargereported occurrenceStage: completed

Historical fraud-charge context; current reported appeal is a separate development.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationallegationStage: completed

Own exploitation-of-affection wording.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: fa7e8ff248ca4aa55da70e7b95883b10b768f6ee5ad544f1db2dd38dcb51a823
Decision: f24b671f2c9db4b62a4d322ba9979959df71093a141ce262e78aecea497988fc
Base reviewed revision: 6aeb7100faffe5ac14caa2e42b17e22122c41fbe46832c1c36a5514fd350dbf5

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.