Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「頂き女子」判決不服として控訴/1億5千万円超詐取で懲役9年 | 四国新聞社

www.shikoku-np.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-05-01
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Shikoku clipping lacks fine amount, dated spans and other woman’s final conviction. Preserve that missingness without borrowing from longer reports.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

code
response.justice
text
懲役9年
reason
Original9year sentence under appeal, not final or served.
subtype
sentence
dimensions
scope
single_case
stage
completed
stance
not_applicable
speaker
reporter
causality
not_established
scam link
explicit
actor role
alleged_offender
statement type
reported_occurrence
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
subject basis
Exact listed own admitted development judgments; distinct subjects/stages remain distinct.
reported outcome
Item 1
stage
reported_filed
limits
No result, age, fine, dated spans or country mapping copied from other Shikoku/longer URLs.
subject
source defendant
Item 2
stage
reported_imposed_under_appeal
limits
No fine, actual served time or details from the other Shikoku URL.
subject
source defendant
original authored application
code
response.justice
note
Original9year sentence under appeal, not final or served.
scope
single_case
stage
completed
stance
not_applicable
speaker
reporter
subtype
sentence
causality
not_established
scam link
explicit
actor role
alleged_offender
statement type
reported_occurrence
original compiled application
code
response.justice
alias
direct_literal/response.justice/sentence
scope
single_case
stage
completed
stance
not_applicable
speaker
reporter
subtype
sentence
group id
W20240429_20240505G005
causality
not_established
record id
W20240429_20240505C0093
scam link
explicit
actor role
alleged_offender
decision id
bafd2bd87b7effee298eaadce6a168a06b83b1aef753652d6459979a055a97a8
document id
fd48287cdba608b27034cf39922011670f5594eb3f134f51b74308b4ed0e24c5
application id
W20240429_20240505A00022
interpretation
Original9year sentence under appeal, not final or served.
statement type
reported_occurrence
source truth verified
false
admitted development judgments
Item 1
result
No listed value
original candidate
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
commentary
reason
Original custom development: appeal. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_filed. Appeal has no exact event; retain own filing status and missing final result. Own-source rationale: This own title directly states appeal. Retained limits: No result, age, fine, dated spans or country mapping copied from other Shikoku/longer URLs.
validated assertion
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
commentary
reason
Original custom development: appeal. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_filed. Appeal has no exact event; retain own filing status and missing final result. Own-source rationale: This own title directly states appeal. Retained limits: No result, age, fine, dated spans or country mapping copied from other Shikoku/longer URLs.
exact retained field
title
exact retained stage
reported_filed
exact retained limits
No result, age, fine, dated spans or country mapping copied from other Shikoku/longer URLs.
exact retained subject
source defendant
Item 2
result
No listed value
original candidate
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
sentence
reason
Original custom development: prison_sentence. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_imposed_under_appeal. The own title supplies the nine-year imposed term under appeal; no term facts are borrowed from another URL. Own-source rationale: This own title expressly supplies the nine-year term, separately from its appeal. Retained limits: No fine, actual served time or details from the other Shikoku URL.
validated assertion
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
sentence
reason
Original custom development: prison_sentence. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_imposed_under_appeal. The own title supplies the nine-year imposed term under appeal; no term facts are borrowed from another URL. Own-source rationale: This own title expressly supplies the nine-year term, separately from its appeal. Retained limits: No fine, actual served time or details from the other Shikoku URL.
exact retained field
title
exact retained stage
reported_imposed_under_appeal
exact retained limits
No fine, actual served time or details from the other Shikoku URL.
exact retained subject
source defendant
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
original dimensions preserved not new attribution approval
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Own Shikoku clipping lacks fine amount, dated spans and other woman’s final conviction. Preserve that missingness without borrowing from longer reports.
field
interpretation
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
own role source layer limits
own actors
Item 1
note
Clipped defendant, no age borrowed.
role
alleged_offender
actor
Mai Watanabe/Riri
Item 2
note
No count supplied.
role
targeted_person
actor
men
analytical note
Own Shikoku clipping lacks fine amount, dated spans and other woman’s final conviction. Preserve that missingness without borrowing from longer reports.
reported developments
Item 1
note
No result or court-country fill.
stage
reported_filed
subject
defendant
development
appeal
own country role proposals
No listed value
explicit calendar year bounds
No listed value
exact ROOT qualified record note
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
commentary
reason
Original custom development: appeal. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_filed. Appeal has no exact event; retain own filing status and missing final result. Own-source rationale: This own title directly states appeal. Retained limits: No result, age, fine, dated spans or country mapping copied from other Shikoku/longer URLs.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
single_case
value
sentence
reason
Original custom development: prison_sentence. Exact subject: source defendant. Exact retained stage: reported_imposed_under_appeal. The own title supplies the nine-year imposed term under appeal; no term facts are borrowed from another URL. Own-source rationale: This own title expressly supplies the nine-year term, separately from its appeal. Retained limits: No fine, actual served time or details from the other Shikoku URL.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
9850aaf9b64ac8b674bc31f72f0ab4e4adaa14b90b3dc2f47658f0f612898a4a
current source binding
input hash
c83aa18ffffb3cda5fc1c01c41081f1bbd17e5c3ff576282673fde7129529d6d
decision id
bafd2bd87b7effee298eaadce6a168a06b83b1aef753652d6459979a055a97a8
document id
fd48287cdba608b27034cf39922011670f5594eb3f134f51b74308b4ed0e24c5
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
764118a37f49e94f01a9bf076e6bca2f2f2b1e71aef0df453745bbe39816497b
finding evidence sha256
e15be425151e626cbc4b76373822d600409bdc65b9dff6d2aa6d4971ea44a9fe
enrichment payload sha256
23a9613cd13e4cd90074f1bcf213df87baecb32ec89a8c790c2c50e9717c639c
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/fd48287cdba608b27034cf39922011670f5594eb3f134f51b74308b4ed0e24c5/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
cc17c6687e88efb5e631490d188e6c60356849156881e3d68095c135353635cc

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed

Own approximate155million aggregate, not per-person.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates

Justice proceedings and outcomes

sentencereported occurrenceStage: completed

Original9year sentence under appeal, not final or served.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationallegationStage: completed

Own exploitation-of-affection description.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: fd48287cdba608b27034cf39922011670f5594eb3f134f51b74308b4ed0e24c5
Decision: bafd2bd87b7effee298eaadce6a168a06b83b1aef753652d6459979a055a97a8
Base reviewed revision: 9850aaf9b64ac8b674bc31f72f0ab4e4adaa14b90b3dc2f47658f0f612898a4a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.