Skip to main content

Living Evidence Synthesis

Revision history

Reporting and Help-Seeking

Approved public versions are listed newest first. Drafts, unsuccessful generation attempts, and versions not yet published through this Research Insight are excluded.

Approved public versions

  1. Version 50

    Current public version

    Automated claim-level support repair round 2, correcting 1 passage from synthesis version 49.

  2. Version 49

    Automated claim-level support repair round 1, correcting 5 passages from synthesis version 48.

  3. Version 48

    Initial version (no prior evidence changes).

    • Publications: 36 (+16)
    • Evidence statements: 124 (+54)
    • Cited sources: 36 (+16)

    Sources added: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; Bi-Directional Exploitation of Human Trafficking Victims: Both Targets and Perpetrators in Cybercrime; Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States; Exploring Fear of Crime for Those Targeted by Romance Fraud; and 15 more.

    Sources removed: Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Love and Technology; The Online Mutual Help Practices of Romance Fraud Victims.

  4. Version 47

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 3. Initial version.

  5. Version 46

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 2. Initial version (no prior revision tracked). This synthesis reproduces and preserves the protected, independently verified passages supplied by the audit without alteration. No additional previously unverified claims were introduced; one paragraph addressing adverse experiences with formal systems was restricted to the single supporting evidence record identified by the audit.

  6. Version 45

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version.

    • Evidence statements: 70 (-3)

    Sources added: Love and Technology.

    Sources removed: The reporting experiences and support needs of victims of online fraud.

  7. Version 44

    Initial version: this synthesis compiles and weights findings from the supplied reviewed evidence records for the controlled topic 'Reporting and Help‑Seeking'. No prior synthesis changes are reported because this is the first generated version based on the provided evidence set.

    • Publications: 20 (-15)
    • Evidence statements: 73 (-40)
    • Cited sources: 20 (-15)

    Sources added: Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; E-Marketing: Utilizing Social Media and Marketplaces to Start Businesses for Online Love Scam Victims in Indonesia; Online frauds: Learning from victims why they fall for these scams; The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam.

    Sources removed: Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States; Love and Technology; Love Scamming in the Digital Era: Legal Protection and Challenges in Handling Love Scam Cases on Dating Applications in Indonesia; and 15 more.

  8. Version 43

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 2. Initial version.

    • Publications: 35 (-2)
    • Evidence statements: 113 (-7)
    • Cited sources: 35 (-2)

    Sources removed: Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; “I Suspect That the Pictures Are Stolen”: Romance Fraud, Identity Crime, and Responding to Suspicions of Inauthentic Identities.

  9. Version 42

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version.

    • Publications: 37 (+1)
    • Evidence statements: 120 (+7)
    • Cited sources: 37 (+1)

    Sources added: Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Love Scamming in the Digital Era: Legal Protection and Challenges in Handling Love Scam Cases on Dating Applications in Indonesia; “I Suspect That the Pictures Are Stolen”: Romance Fraud, Identity Crime, and Responding to Suspicions of Inauthentic Identities.

    Sources removed: Romance Scam and Legal Interpreting/Translation; The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam.

  10. Version 41

    Initial version: no prior-version evidence changes to report.

    • Publications: 36 (+10)
    • Evidence statements: 113 (+17)
    • Cited sources: 36 (+10)

    Sources added: Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States; Hook, line, and sinker: the mechanics of fraud; Love and Technology; and 14 more.

    Sources removed: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Exploring Fear of Crime for Those Targeted by Romance Fraud; From swipe to swindle: a narrative review of research on older adult victims of romance fraud; and 4 more.

Return to Reporting and Help-Seeking