Skip to main content

Living Evidence Synthesis

Revision history

Reporting and Help-Seeking

Approved public versions are listed newest first. Drafts, unsuccessful generation attempts, and versions not yet published through this Research Insight are excluded.

Approved public versions

  1. Version 20

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 2. Initial version.

  2. Version 19

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version.

    • Publications: 21 (-3)
    • Evidence statements: 75 (-11)
    • Cited sources: 21 (-3)

    Sources removed: Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators Of Romance Fraud In Cyberspace; Online Dating Scam Victims Psychological Impact Analysis; The effect of true crime docuseries on romance fraud reporting to the police.

  3. Version 18

    Initial version.

    • Publications: 24 (-12)
    • Evidence statements: 86 (-44)
    • Cited sources: 24 (-12)

    Sources added: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators Of Romance Fraud In Cyberspace; My Parents Expectations Were Overwhelming: Online Dating Romance Scams Targeting Minors in Iran Through Exploitation of Parental Pressure; and 3 more.

    Sources removed: Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States; Does age matter? Examining seniors’ experiences of romance fraud; Exploring Fear of Crime for Those Targeted by Romance Fraud; and 15 more.

  4. Version 17

    Automated claim-level support repair round 2, correcting 2 passages from synthesis version 16.

  5. Version 16

    Automated claim-level support repair round 1, correcting 5 passages from synthesis version 15.

  6. Version 15

    Initial version synthesising the supplied evidence records; no prior-version evidence changes to report.

    • Publications: 36 (+4)
    • Evidence statements: 130 (+8)
    • Cited sources: 36 (+4)

    Sources added: Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States; Does age matter? Examining seniors’ experiences of romance fraud; Profiling consumers who reported mass marketing scams: demographic characteristics and emotional sentiments associated with victimization; and 8 more.

    Sources removed: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; From swipe to swindle: a narrative review of research on older adult victims of romance fraud; More Than Just a “Bad” Online Experience: Risk Factors and Characteristics of Catfishing Fraud Victimization; Romance Scamming: Uncovering the Transnational Crime and Legal Challenges; and 4 more.

  7. Version 14

    Automated claim-level support repair of 1 passage from synthesis version 13.

  8. Version 13

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 2. Initial version.

    • Publications: 32 (+1)
    • Evidence statements: 122 (+6)
    • Cited sources: 32 (+1)

    Sources added: Exploring Fear of Crime for Those Targeted by Romance Fraud.

  9. Version 12

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. This synthesis is a replacement document prepared to align with the independent verification audit. Protected passages identified by the audit were preserved verbatim with their required evidence IDs. Other passages were retained, narrowed, or removed to reflect only claims that the supplied evidence directly supports; unsupported or over‑stated assertions noted by the audit were removed or reformulated to match available records. This is the first...

    • Publications: 31 (-3)
    • Evidence statements: 116 (-4)
    • Cited sources: 31 (-3)

    Sources removed: Romance Scam and Legal Interpreting/Translation; The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam; “Falling into a Black Hole”: A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences of Cyberscam Victim-Survivors and Their Social Support Networks.

  10. Version 11

    Initial version (no prior-version evidence changes to report).

    • Publications: 34 (+13)
    • Evidence statements: 120 (+41)
    • Cited sources: 34 (+13)

    Sources added: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; Analysis of a Cryptocurrency Investment Scam: Pig Butchering; From swipe to swindle: a narrative review of research on older adult victims of romance fraud; Mental Health Impacts of Cybercrime; and 14 more.

    Sources removed: Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; Mapping Computer Mediated Communication Theories and Persuasive Strategies in Analysing Online Dating Romance Scam; Romance Scam as one of the main Challenges of cybercrime; The prevention of online romance scams using a crime script analysis from the victim’s perspective; and 1 more.

Return to Reporting and Help-Seeking