Skip to main content

Living Evidence Synthesis

Revision history

Reporting and Help-Seeking

Approved public versions are listed newest first. Drafts, unsuccessful generation attempts, and versions not yet published through this Research Insight are excluded.

Approved public versions

  1. Version 40

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version.

    • Publications: 26 (+1)
    • Evidence statements: 96 (+2)
    • Cited sources: 26 (+1)

    Sources added: Online romance scams and victimhood.

  2. Version 39

    Initial version: this synthesis was created as the first consolidated evidence synthesis for the controlled topic using the supplied reviewed evidence records. No prior-version changes were applied.

    • Publications: 25 (-5)
    • Evidence statements: 94 (-18)
    • Cited sources: 25 (-5)

    Sources added: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Exploring Fear of Crime for Those Targeted by Romance Fraud; From swipe to swindle: a narrative review of research on older adult victims of romance fraud; and 6 more.

    Sources removed: Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; E-Marketing: Utilizing Social Media and Marketplaces to Start Businesses for Online Love Scam Victims in Indonesia; Legal Protection for Victims of Love Scam Crimes; Meeting you was a fake: investigating the increase in romance fraud during COVID-19; and 11 more.

  3. Version 38

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 3. Initial version.

  4. Version 37

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 2. Initial version.

    • Publications: 30 (-1)
    • Evidence statements: 112 (-2)
    • Cited sources: 30 (-1)

    Sources removed: Hook, line, and sinker: the mechanics of fraud.

  5. Version 36

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version: this synthesis is the first consolidated replacement produced to meet the audit constraints and preserved verbatim the previously identified protected passages. No prior-version evidence changes apply because this is the initial produced revision.

    • Publications: 31 (-1)
    • Evidence statements: 114 (-4)
    • Cited sources: 31 (-1)

    Sources removed: “You’re not alone”: the use of peer support groups for fraud victims.

  6. Version 35

    Initial version.

    • Publications: 32 (-9)
    • Evidence statements: 118 (-17)
    • Cited sources: 32 (-9)

    Sources added: Hook, line, and sinker: the mechanics of fraud; Legal Protection for Victims of Love Scam Crimes; Love Scamming in the Digital Era: Legal Protection and Challenges in Handling Love Scam Cases on Dating Applications in Indonesia; Meeting you was a fake: investigating the increase in romance fraud during COVID-19; and 3 more.

    Sources removed: Addressing Cyberscams and Acquired Brain Injury (“I Desperately Need to Know What to Do”): Qualitative Exploration of Clinicians’ and Service Providers’ Perspectives; Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States; From swipe to swindle: a narrative review of research on older adult victims of romance fraud; Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators Of Romance Fraud In Cyberspace; and 12 more.

  7. Version 34

    Automated claim-level support repair round 1, correcting 2 passages from synthesis version 33.

  8. Version 33

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 5. Initial version.

    • Publications: 41 (+3)
    • Evidence statements: 135 (+19)
    • Cited sources: 41 (+3)

    Sources added: Expectations vs reality: Responding to online fraud across the fraud justice network; Mental Health Impacts of Cybercrime; The Role of Love stories in Romance Scams: A Qualitative Analysis of Fraudulent Profiles.

  9. Version 32

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 4. Initial version: no prior synthesis changes to report.

  10. Version 31

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 3. Initial version. This is the first complete replacement synthesis produced for the controlled topic using the supplied reviewed evidence. No prior machine-generated revision history from this request was incorporated.

Return to Reporting and Help-Seeking