Living Evidence Synthesis
Revision history
Victim Vulnerabilities
Approved public versions are listed newest first. Drafts, unsuccessful generation attempts, and versions not yet published through this Research Insight are excluded.
Approved public versions
-
Version 71
Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version.
- Publications: 33 (-4)
- Evidence statements: 134 (-27)
- Cited sources: 33 (-4)
Sources removed: Digital romance fraud targeting unmarried women; Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Romance Scam: Victim Manipulation and Human Trafficking; “Why did I fall for it?” Exploring internet fraud susceptibility in the pig butchering scam.
-
Version 70
Initial version.
- Publications: 37 (+2)
- Evidence statements: 161 (+26)
- Cited sources: 37 (+2)
Sources added: A crime script perspective on mapping the entry, continuation, and exit pathways of online romance fraud; A Study on Romance Scam : The Current Situation and Effective Countermeasures; Digital romance fraud targeting unmarried women; Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; and 10 more.
Sources removed: Catfishing – jako przejaw przestępstwa kradzieży tożsamości; Crypto-Cognitive Exploitation: Integrating Cognitive, Social, and Technological perspectives on cryptocurrency fraud; More than Money: Examining the Potential Exposure of Romance Fraud Victims to Identity Crime; Online Romance Scammers; and 8 more.
-
Version 69
Automated claim-level support repair round 1, correcting 1 passage from synthesis version 68.
-
Version 68
Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 2. Initial version.
- Publications: 35 (-2)
- Evidence statements: 135 (-7)
- Cited sources: 35 (-2)
Sources removed: Understanding the Nature of the Transnational Scam-Related Fraud: Challenges and Solutions from Vietnam’s Perspective; Who can spot an online romance scam?.
-
Version 67
Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version (no prior evidence changes).
- Publications: 37 (-2)
- Evidence statements: 142 (-23)
- Cited sources: 37 (-2)
Sources added: Online Romance Scammers; Profiling consumers who reported mass marketing scams: demographic characteristics and emotional sentiments associated with victimization; Understanding the Nature of the Transnational Scam-Related Fraud: Challenges and Solutions from Vietnam’s Perspective; Victim-offender overlap: the identity transformations experienced by trafficked Chinese workers escaping from pig-butchering scam syndicate.
Sources removed: Amor, dependencia y aislamiento: El impacto psicológico del romance scam; A systematic literature review of profiling victims of cyber scams: setting up a framework for future research; Grooming in online dating romance frauds and scams: A scoping review; My Parents Expectations Were Overwhelming: Online Dating Romance Scams Targeting Minors in Iran Through Exploitation of Parental Pressure; and 2 more.
-
Version 66
Initial version.
- Publications: 39 (+7)
- Evidence statements: 165 (+16)
- Cited sources: 39 (+7)
Sources added: A Research on False Pragmatic Identity Construction in Telecom Network Dating Scam; A scoping review of online romance scams: Conceptual construction and comparative analysis; A systematic literature review of profiling victims of cyber scams: setting up a framework for future research; Catfishing: a conduta de assumir uma identidade falsa nas plataformas de mídia social e suas consequências jurídico-penais; and 15 more.
Sources removed: Distort, Extort, Deceive and Exploit: Exploring the Inner Workings of a Romance Fraud; Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers; Drawing on social approval as a linguistic strategy: A discourse semantic analysis of judgement evaluation in suspected online romance scammer dating profiles; Factors of susceptibility to online romance scam in Malaysia: unraveling the complex pathways; and 8 more.
-
Version 65
Automated claim-level support repair round 1, correcting 2 passages from synthesis version 64.
-
Version 64
Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version: this is the first evidence-synthesis replacement produced for the controlled topic "Victim Vulnerabilities" using the supplied reviewed evidence. No prior machine-generated synthesis changes apply.
- Publications: 32 (-7)
- Evidence statements: 149 (-16)
- Cited sources: 32 (-7)
Sources added: Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers.
Sources removed: A Research on False Pragmatic Identity Construction in Telecom Network Dating Scam; Grooming in online dating romance frauds and scams: A scoping review; Love scam in cyberspace; Reality Counseling Approach to Increasing Career Woman Awareness (Case Study Love Scam); and 4 more.
-
Version 63
Initial version: no previous-version evidence changes are reported for this synthesis.
- Publications: 39 (+17)
- Evidence statements: 165 (+62)
- Cited sources: 39 (+17)
Sources added: Amor, dependencia y aislamiento: El impacto psicológico del romance scam; A Research on False Pragmatic Identity Construction in Telecom Network Dating Scam; Cyber Romance Scam Victimization Analysis using Routine Activity Theory Versus Apriori Algorithm; Distort, Extort, Deceive and Exploit: Exploring the Inner Workings of a Romance Fraud; and 18 more.
Sources removed: A scoping review of online romance scams: Conceptual construction and comparative analysis; How does Victim Precipitation Theory explain Deviant Behaviours of Internet Romance Offenders? Gamer’s Perspective of Victim Precipitation; Mapping Computer Mediated Communication Theories and Persuasive Strategies in Analysing Online Dating Romance Scam; Neutralizations, Altercasting, and Online Romance Fraud Victimizations; and 1 more.
-
Version 62
Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 5. Initial version. No prior-version evidence changes to report.