Skip to main content

Relationship fraud: Romance, friendship and family frauds

Button, Mark ; Carter, Elisabeth (2024) — Journal of Economic Criminology

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100069 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   United Kingdom
Tags:   Financial Abuse, Pig Butchering, Relationship Based Investment Fraud, Relationship Fraud, Romance Scams, Sextortion, Victim Blaming
Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This editorial introduces a special issue through a narrative overview of relationship fraud. It presents a preliminary typology built from known cases, describes common relationship-fraud mechanisms, and synthesises the focus and contributions of ten included papers. Victim-blaming narratives deepen harm and create barriers to reporting and aftercare. The proposed typology is explicitly described as a non-definitive starting point to be developed further.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Research has concentrated narrowly on online dating fraud and female victims in heterosexual relationships. Male and same-sex victims have received little research. Several relationship-fraud categories in the typology, offenders, and public sentiment are also described as under-researched. The authors state that relationship fraud more broadly remains under-researched.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
This editorial introduces a special issue through a narrative overview of relationship fraud. It presents a preliminary typology built from known cases, describes common relationship-fraud mechanisms, and synthesises the focus and contributions of ten included papers. It does not report a standalone empirical sample, data collection procedure, or formal systematic review.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The proposed typology is explicitly described as a non-definitive starting point to be developed further. The article is an editorial overview rather than a standalone empirical study, so its claims primarily synthesise examples and referenced scholarship rather than presenting new original data or testing prevalence, causation, or intervention effectiveness.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Conduct research across the broader range of relationship frauds beyond online romance fraud, including under-researched categories in the proposed typology. Priorities include male and same-sex romance-fraud victims, offender rationalisations, public attitudes and blame, sextortion, inheritance-focused fraud, and victim experiences and help-seeking.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.