Skip to main content

The dark side of Artificial Intelligence – Risks arising in dating applications

Rachel Fletcher ; Calli Tzani ; Maria Ioannou (2024) — Assessment and Development Matters

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This is a narrative source review. The authors conducted general internet searches using terms concerning AI, dating applications, social media, romance fraud, and sextortion, and explored empirical literature. Findings synthesize concerns raised across internet and empirical sources; no original participant data collection, systematic search protocol, or primary analysis is reported. AI-driven automated bots in dating applications can impersonate genuine conversational partners to obtain personal information, induce malicious-link clicks, or solicit financial details. Catfishing using fake profiles and imagery is described as a common precursor to romance fraud and sextortion. The article relies on general internet searches alongside empirical literature and does not report a systematic review protocol, inclusion criteria, search dates, or appraisal of source quality.

Identified Gaps

The article identifies a lack of empirical research on harmful AI uses in dating and social-media contexts. Specific gaps concern psychological effects and support for deepfake targets, effective deepfake detection and distribution prevention, the contribution of facial recognition to harassment and stalking, and the current prevalence and nature of fraudulent dating applications. Existing romance-fraud advice based on reverse-image searches may also be outdated where perpetrators use original deepfake content.

Methods

This is a narrative source review. The authors conducted general internet searches using terms concerning AI, dating applications, social media, romance fraud, and sextortion, and explored empirical literature. Findings synthesize concerns raised across internet and empirical sources; no original participant data collection, systematic search protocol, or primary analysis is reported.

Limitations

The article relies on general internet searches alongside empirical literature and does not report a systematic review protocol, inclusion criteria, search dates, or appraisal of source quality. Several claims are framed as concerns, anecdotal evidence, or speculation about emerging risks rather than direct evidence of prevalence or causal impact. Its broad scope combines dating-app fraud with sextortion, child sexual abuse material, and cyberstalking.

Future Work

Research should examine the psychological consequences of deepfake victimization and available emotional support; develop and evaluate detection and prevention strategies for deepfake material; investigate whether facial recognition contributes to stalking and harassment; update evidence on the prevalence and operation of fraudulent dating apps; and identify practical solutions to block their distribution. Public education should also be developed so users can recognize AI-enabled criminal methods and protect privacy.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.