Skip to main content

Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims

Whitty, MT. (2017) — Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This U.K. Qualtrics-panel questionnaire study compared 200 self-identified romance-scam victims with respondents who reported never being scammed by any mass-marketing fraud. A logistic regression tested demographic, personality, trust, impulsivity, addictive-disposition, and cybersecurity-knowledge measures. Higher urgency, sensation seeking, addictive disposition, and education were associated with victimhood, while lower self-rated kindness and trustworthiness were also associated. In the victim sample, 60% were women and 63% were middle-aged. These are group-level associations, not a reliable profile for identifying individual victims. The cross-sectional design, online-panel recruitment, and self-reported scam and psychological measures cannot establish whether the measured characteristics preceded victimization or generalize to people outside the panel.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies a paucity of MMF victimology research and little prior knowledge about whether education and kindness distinguish victims from nonvictims. It also notes unresolved explanations for the counterintuitive findings that higher education and lower kindness predicted romance-scam victimhood.

Methods

UK Qualtrics-panel questionnaire study. The final sample included 200 romance-scam victims and a comparison group never scammed by any MMF. Participants completed demographic items and measures of impulsivity, locus of control, trust, trustworthiness, kindness, greed, addictive disposition, and self-rated cybersecurity knowledge. Forced-entry binary logistic regression tested predictors of romance-scam victimhood.

Limitations

The study used an online panel, self-reported scam experience, and self-report psychological measures, so findings may not fully generalize beyond panel respondents or establish whether traits preceded victimization. The design compares victims with people never scammed by any MMF, and the paper presents speculative rather than tested explanations for the education and kindness findings.

Future Work

Test explanations for the education finding, including dating-site use and overconfidence in detecting scams. Clarify why lower kindness is associated with victimhood, including whether isolation, reduced social networks, or post-scam effects contribute. Evaluate targeted awareness and prevention programs, including addiction-informed approaches to prevent revictimization.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.