Skip to main content

Developments in the Law Governing Online Activity: The Criminalisation of Catfishing and Civil Relief in Cases of Image-Based Sexual Abuse

Michael James Boland (2025) — SSRN Electronic Journal

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5219621 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Ireland
Tags:   Catfishing, Civil Remedies, Criminalisation, Deepfakes, Image Based Sexual Abuse, Legal Certainty, Online Grooming, Representative Actions
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This doctrinal legal analysis examines Irish criminal and civil law governing catfishing, online grooming, image-based sexual abuse, and AI-generated deepfakes. The article interprets the proposed Non-Fatal Offences against the Person (Amendment) Bill 2024 alongside the amended harassment provision, grooming law, the 2020 and 2018 Acts, the proposed AI Liability Directive, and Digital Rights Ireland v Discord Inc. Digital Rights Ireland brought a representative action for six Irish victims whose intimate images were allegedly posted to Discord without consent. Irish law already criminalises non-consensual recording, distribution, or threatened distribution of intimate material, including faked or altered material. This is a normative doctrinal article rather than an empirical study of catfishing prevalence, victim experiences, reporting, enforcement, or outcomes.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The article identifies legal uncertainty over whether the amended harassment offence adequately protects the person deceived by a catfish, rather than only the person whose identity is misappropriated. It argues that catfishing is insufficiently visible and accessible as a distinct offence when subsumed under existing law. It also notes unresolved civil-redress issues for AI deepfakes: the AI Liability Directive was withdrawn, and compensable harms would have been left to Member State discretion.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
Doctrinal legal analysis of Irish criminal and civil law governing catfishing, online grooming, image-based sexual abuse, and AI-generated deepfakes. The article interprets the proposed Non-Fatal Offences against the Person (Amendment) Bill 2024 alongside the amended harassment provision, grooming law, the 2020 and 2018 Acts, the proposed AI Liability Directive, and Digital Rights Ireland v Discord Inc. It also draws on Seanad debates, legislation, legal scholarship, and policy materials.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
This is a normative doctrinal article rather than an empirical study of catfishing prevalence, victim experiences, reporting, enforcement, or outcomes. Several conclusions are necessarily contingent: the catfishing Bill collapsed and requires reintroduction; Digital Rights Ireland v Discord Inc. remains unresolved; and the proposed AI Liability Directive was withdrawn. Claims regarding future civil compensation for AI deepfakes are therefore reasoned legal arguments rather than established law.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Reintroduce the Non-Fatal Offences against the Person (Amendment) Bill 2024, or an amended version, to create a standalone catfishing offence. Policymakers should monitor online behavioural trends so law can anticipate or respond rapidly to emerging harms. If an AI Liability Directive is revived, Irish transposition should include harm from AI-generated intimate material among compensable harms.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.