Skip to main content

ROMANCE AND RUIN: THE INTERPLAY OF FINANCIAL LOSS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AMONG LOVE SCAM VICTIMS IN THE PHILIPPINES

Dr. Rhem Rick N. Corpuz ; Mary Joy G. Galang ; Kim Hope S. Gueco ; Kate D. Pamintuan (2025) — EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR)

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.36713/epra25491 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Philippines
Tags:   AI-Enabled Fraud, Facebook, Financial Loss, Help Seeking, Love Bombing, Love Scams, Measurement, Offender Tactics, Online Dating Platforms, Philippines, Prevention, Psychological Distress, Psychology, Romance Scams, Victim Experience
Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This paper examines the relationship between financial loss and psychological well-being among victims of online romance scams in the Philippines using a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design. The study surveyed 384 Filipino social media users who had experienced or encountered love scams, collecting data on demographics, platforms used, scam tactics, financial losses, psychological distress, and help-seeking behavior. Findings show that victims were predominantly young, single women, most active on Facebook, with scams typically identified within one to three months of initial contact. The most common manipulation strategies were love bombing and emotional promises of a future together, while digital wallets (e.g., GCash, PayMaya) were the primary modes of financial transfer. Most respondents reported modest financial losses, but statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between financial loss and psychological distress (increased sadness, stress, anxiety) and a negative association with quality of life. Psychological impacts included persistent sadness, self-blame, loss of trust, heightened suspicion of others, and increased caution in forming online relationships. Despite these effects, nearly half of the victims did not report the scam to authorities or platforms, often seeking no professional or social support, suggesting barriers such as shame, stigma, or limited access to resources. The study concludes that financial loss is a key driver of psychological harm in romance scam victimization and emphasizes the need for targeted awareness campaigns, improved platform monitoring, safeguards in digital payment systems, and accessible victim support services tailored to vulnerable populations in the Philippine context.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The paper identifies limited localized Philippine evidence on the psychological effects of love-scam victimization. It notes that prior research often emphasizes scam typologies or global trends, leaving insufficient understanding of financial-loss extent and its association with psychological well-being in Philippine contexts. Findings also indicate gaps in accessible victim support and formal help-seeking.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
A quantitative cross-sectional survey of 384 Philippine adults who had been victimized or targeted by online romance scams. Participants were recruited purposively through online and community-based collection; data were gathered via Google Forms and face-to-face structured, self-administered questionnaires. Measures covered demographics, platform use, scam experiences and tactics, financial loss, reporting, and Likert-scale psychological well-being. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations were conducted in SPSS and Jamovi (p < .05).

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The cross-sectional survey design supports association rather than causal inference about financial loss and psychological well-being. Purposive/convenience recruitment of adults who reported being victimized or targeted may limit representativeness and introduce self-selection bias. Self-administered retrospective reports of scam experiences, losses, tactics, and distress may also be affected by recall, disclosure, or social-desirability bias.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Further research should examine long-term emotional recovery and evaluate effective prevention strategies. The paper also recommends testing platform detection of manipulative behaviors, transaction safeguards for new recipients, and targeted digital-literacy and awareness initiatives.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.