Skip to main content

Bi-Directional Exploitation of Human Trafficking Victims: Both Targets and Perpetrators in Cybercrime

Gargi Sarkar ; Sandeep K. Shukla (2024) — Journal of Human Trafficking

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The article employs theoretical analysis and synthesis of reports to articulate a bidirectional relationship between cybercrime and human trafficking. It reviews mechanisms of cyber-enabled trafficking (phishing, disinformation, online romance, pig-butchering), traces origins (Cambodia regulatory changes; COVID-era dynamics), and discusses impacts on victims and funding for organized crime, followed by policy and enforcement implications. The label "pig butchering" may stigmatize victims, increase shame, and discourage crime reporting. Cybercrime succeeds through social engineering that exploits fear, trust, greed, love, curiosity, scarcity, urgency, and emotional narratives. Limitations include reliance on secondary reports and policy documents, potential source bias, under-reporting and clandestine networks, attribution challenges in cybercrime, regional focus on Southeast Asia limiting generalizability, and limited granular victim data.

Identified Gaps

Explicit gaps include limited empirical data on the bidirectional nexus, especially victim experiences and the scale of male-educated victims; need for cross-national datasets; insufficient understanding of how cyber-enabled trafficking expands via SEZs; lack of standardized methods to measure hybrid crimes; gaps in policy implementation and enforcement across jurisdictions; need to assess the effectiveness of current international responses and cooperation.

Methods

The article employs theoretical analysis and synthesis of reports to articulate a bidirectional relationship between cybercrime and human trafficking. It reviews mechanisms of cyber-enabled trafficking (phishing, disinformation, online romance, pig-butchering), traces origins (Cambodia regulatory changes; COVID-era dynamics), and discusses impacts on victims and funding for organized crime, followed by policy and enforcement implications.

Limitations

Limitations include reliance on secondary reports and policy documents, potential source bias, under-reporting and clandestine networks, attribution challenges in cybercrime, regional focus on Southeast Asia limiting generalizability, and limited granular victim data.

Future Work

Future work should pursue empirical exploration of bidirectional cyber-enabled trafficking, including prevalence, victim trajectories, and the role of male, educated victims. Studies with cross-border data, comparative regional analyses, and longitudinal designs are needed to quantify the synergy between cybercrime and trafficking. Evaluate effectiveness of legal interventions and policy measures; develop detection and prevention strategies for online recruitment, romance scams, and pig-butchering; assess the impact of SEZs and cross-border corridors. Encourage multi-stakeholder collaboration among policymakers, law enforcement, international organizations, and researchers; build data-sharing frameworks and capacity-building for victim support and prosecution.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.