Skip to main content

Internet Scamming and the Techniques of Neutralization: Parents’ Excuses and Justifications for Children’s Involvement in Online Dating Fraud in Nigeria

Aborisade, Richard Abayomi (2022) — International Annals of Criminology

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This study investigates how the parents of online dating scammers in Nigeria respond to their children’s involvement in romance fraud, using the framework of Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization. It aims to extend neutralization theory beyond offenders to the social networks around them, examining how parents justify or excuse their children’s deviant conduct. The research draws on qualitative data collected from 52 interviews with parents, followed by thematic analysis to elicit patterns in their narratives. Methodologically, the study situates itself in a Nigerian context, where romance scams have been prominent and where public discourse has suggested parental endorsement of offenders. The author reports that most participants were aware of the illegality of online dating scams and initially opposed the practice, yet many shifted toward acceptance of their children’s involvement. The analysis identifies four superordinate themes—responsibility, injury or victims, condemnation, and appeals to higher loyalties—through which parents rationalize or deflect blame, often adopting or transmitting the scammers’ own neutralization techniques. Principal findings indicate that parents sometimes internalize their children’s justifications, even benefiting from proceeds, and in some cases actively advised or supported involvement. Several participants downplayed the harm to victims, framed the crime as a private or victimless matter, or attributed wrongdoing to broader socio-economic conditions or external enemies. The discussion reflects on implications for theory, policy, and practice, noting that families can erode social controls and that religious or community loyalties are mobilized to rationalize deviance. The study calls for triangulated research and greater sincerity in law enforcement and governance to curb cybercrimes. Overall, the work provides a grounded, theory-focused portrait of how parental attitudes can shape the persistence of Internet dating scams in Nigeria.

Identified Gaps

Prior neutralization research has mainly examined the offender-victim-cybercrime relationship and has insufficiently represented parents and other relatives as possible accomplices or sources of support. The study also identifies a need for theory that explains how offenders' social networks adopt neutralizations for relatives' deviance.

Methods

This Nigeria-based qualitative study conducted 52 interviews with biological parents of people, mainly students, who admitted involvement in Internet dating scams. Participants were recruited indirectly through students after public and online recruitment yielded few volunteers. Interviews took place from August 2020 to September 2021 and were analyzed thematically in NVivo 12 using line-by-line coding, constant comparison, two independent coders, and reflexive field notes.

Limitations

The evidence is based only on 52 self-selected parents, predominantly mothers (41 of 52), whose children were mainly student scammers. Recruitment was difficult and relied on students to contact parents, which may have excluded less connected or less willing families. Findings reflect parental accounts rather than corroborated accounts from offenders or victims, limiting transferability and verification.

Future Work

Future studies should triangulate the perspectives of romance-scam offenders, victims, and associates when applying neutralization theory, to provide multiple viewpoints on the theory's role in the rise and persistence of Internet scams.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.