Skip to main content

It's All Over but the Crying: The Emotional and Financial Impact of Internet Fraud

Modic, David ; Anderson, Ross (2015) — IEEE Security & Privacy

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1109/msp.2015.107 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Global
Tags:   Emotional Impact, Financial Loss, Internet Fraud, Online Survey, Romance Scams, Scam Compliance, Victimization
Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This article examines the emotional and financial consequences of Internet fraud, arguing that understanding these affective outcomes is essential to fighting fraud. The authors analyze a large, self‑selected sample of respondents who reported experiences with online scams, focusing on two dependent variables: emotional impact and financial impact. They assess responses across ten common online fraud schemes and report how victims’ perceptions of impact vary by fraud type, rather than providing population estimates. The study relies on self‑reported measures of perceived impact and behavioral responses to scams, treating the results as illustrative of victims’ experiences rather than definitive population facts. Key findings indicate that emotional costs can be as salient as financial costs across many fraud categories. The analysis shows that emotional impact often ranks highly, sometimes rivaling or exceeding financial losses in terms of perceived severity, with romance and advance‑fee scams highlighted as particularly impactful emotionally. Financial losses also varied by scheme, with certain categories associated with larger monetary losses while others elicited substantial distress despite smaller dollar amounts. The authors report that perceptions of impact differ according to individual circumstances, such as wealth or personal utility, and that there is a notable relationship between financial loss and emotional response for several schemes. They also suggest that policy responses should address both affective states and financial harm, and they discuss potential strategies for mitigating stress and facilitating recovery after victimization. Overall, the work foregrounds the emotional toll of online fraud alongside monetary costs, arguing for a broader view of fraud prevention and victim support.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The article identifies comparatively little prior research on victims' emotional costs. It also notes that the effects of optimism bias and false illusions of control on scam compliance were outside its scope. More evidence is needed on emotional consequences across fraud categories and on interventions that reduce both engagement and post-victimization distress.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The authors analyzed an online questionnaire advertised through BBC Future in October 2014. After excluding incomplete responses, the sample contained 6,609 self-selected participants. Respondents rated compliance stages for 10 online fraud schemes and self-reported financial and emotional impact. Analyses included correlations, multinomial regression, ANOVAs, and a 2 × 1 ANOVA among respondents who reported losing utility to Internet fraud (n = 1,366).

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The study used a self-selected online sample recruited through BBC Future, limiting representativeness. The final sample was disproportionately male (71%), generally older, and highly educated. Measures of compliance, financial loss, and emotional impact were self-reported. Nearly 3,884 initial responses were excluded for substantial missing data. The analysis of victim impacts focused on 10 specified schemes, while some participants reported losses from other scams.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Future research should test whether interventions that challenge scammers' reassurances, address affect-driven engagement, and use therapeutic reframing reduce post-scam distress and harmful decision-making. It should also examine how optimism bias and perceived control affect scam compliance, which this article identifies as beyond its scope.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.