Skip to main content

Behind the Mask: The Devastating Emotional Fallout of Catfishing

Stephnie Hon ; John Croucher (2026) — Journal of Medical Sciences and Health Care Research

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.66311/3068-9104.03.03.01 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Global
Tags:   AI-Enabled Fraud, Catfishing, Emotional Trauma, Offender Tactics, Online Dating, Romance Scams, Sextortion, Victim Experience
Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This publication examines catfishing as a predatory online behavior in dating contexts, focusing on how false identities are constructed and used to manipulate others for financial gain or emotional control. The authors describe catfishing as the creation of fake online personas—often with stolen or fabricated photos and background stories—to cultivate romantic or intimate connections, followed by coercion, manipulation, or extortion. The work situates catfishing within broader online fraud and identity-theft concerns, arguing that such deception harms victims’ emotional wellbeing, privacy, and financial security, and may lead to reputational damage. Methodologically, the article presents a narrative synthesis anchored by multiple case studies drawn from international examples. Cases illustrate varied disguises (for example, manipulative impostors posing as military personnel, professionals, or other attractive figures) and escalating demands for money, intimate images, or personal information. The discussion connects these stories to patterns of grooming, rapid shifts to private communications, and threats of exposure or sextortion. The authors also reference aggregate data from Australian authorities to quantify the scale of romance fraud, noting substantial financial losses and numerous victims in 2025. They underscore the legal and ethical dimensions of catfishing, including identity theft and potential criminal consequences for perpetrators. The publication concludes that catfishing is a serious digital-era harm with psychological, financial, and social ramifications. It advocates for platform verification, robust reporting mechanisms, and victim-support resources, while acknowledging that further research is needed to refine prevention and response strategies. The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing online deception as a legitimate public-safety concern and the necessity of safety education for users.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The article identifies a need for robust safety strategies and effective victim-support mechanisms. It provides no systematic empirical evidence on the effectiveness of verification, reporting, education, or support interventions.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The article is a narrative, case-based discussion of catfishing. It synthesizes cited literature, media reports, legal and coronial cases, and an Australian loss statistic to describe tactics, warning signs, harms, and possible safety responses. Although a section is labeled “Methods,” it describes offender techniques rather than a reproducible research protocol.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
No original sample, data-collection procedure, analytic method, inclusion criteria, or systematic review process is reported. Many assertions rely on illustrative media and legal cases, so prevalence, causal claims, and generalizability cannot be assessed. The article also combines financially motivated romance fraud with broader catfishing motives.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Introduce victim-support mechanisms to mitigate catfishing-related harms. Platforms should invest in identity-verification systems, reporting mechanisms, and user education.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.