Skip to main content

Victim Profiling Under Financial Crimes

Pankaj Bhardwaj ; Chander Mohan Gupta (2025) — Fundamentals of Forensic Victimology: Insights into Crime, Trauma, and Justice, pp.33–38

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

Victim Profiling Under Financial Crimes examines how fraudsters identify and exploit individuals who are most susceptible to financial deception. The article frames victim profiling as a deliberate analysis of psychological, social, and behavioral characteristics that can make someone vulnerable to schemes such as phishing, romance scams, investment fraud, and other cyber-enabled or traditional financial frauds. It notes that rapid digitalization and cross-border crime complicate victim identification and protection, and it emphasizes that understanding victim vulnerabilities can inform regulatory design and preventive strategies. The authors describe a multifactor basis for profiling, including psychological biases (such as impulsivity and overconfidence), demographic factors (age, income, education), technological familiarity, and emotional or social conditions (distress, loneliness). They summarize methods fraudsters use to locate victims, such as social media analysis, data from breaches, and AI-assisted phishing, and they discuss how criminals leverage social engineering and psychological manipulation to induce risky financial behavior. The article also catalogs common fraud types where profiling plays a role, including phishing, romance scams, and business email compromise, and highlights the alleged need for financial literacy, cybersecurity awareness, and stronger consumer protections as preventive responses. The conclusion asserts that financial fraud is influenced by a combination of personal vulnerabilities and broader structural factors, and it calls for ongoing research, education, and coordinated regulatory efforts to reduce victimization. It underscores the potential value of profiling-informed prevention while noting challenges in cross-jurisdictional enforcement and the evolving digital threat landscape.

Identified Gaps

The chapter identifies a need for predictive models to enable early fraud identification and intervention. It offers broad vulnerability factors but does not present a validated profiling model, original victim dataset, or a focused empirical analysis of romance-scam victims. Romance fraud is treated as one financial-crime subtype within a wider discussion.

Methods

This is a conceptual, narrative synthesis of cited research on victim profiling in financial crime. It describes psychological, demographic, technological, socioeconomic, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with fraud vulnerability, and outlines offender targeting methods and prevention implications. No original data collection, sample, analytic procedure, or systematic-review protocol is reported.

Limitations

The chapter does not report an original sample, data source, search strategy, study-selection criteria, or formal analytic method. Consequently, the strength and comparability of the cited evidence cannot be assessed from the text. Its treatment of romance scams is brief and embedded in a broad financial-crime overview rather than supported by dedicated romance-fraud data.

Future Work

Continue research on victim profiles to develop prediction models for early fraud identification and intervention. Research should support multidisciplinary prevention that addresses human and institutional weaknesses, including financial education, digital literacy, cybersecurity practices, regulation, and coordination among banks and law enforcement.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.