Skip to main content

‘Funds Left Delaware in the Morning’: Online Fraud Networks and Money Laundering Operations

Suleman Lazarus (2026) — International Criminal Justice Review

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1177/10575677261416902 (opens in a new tab)

Country:   Global
Tags:   Business Email Compromise, Cybercriminal Networks, Forensic Ethnography, Hybrid Fraud, Identity Modularity, Money Laundering, Romance Scams, Transnational Crime
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This publication presents a neutral, source-grounded synopsis of Suleman Lazarus’s analysis of United States v. Olugbenga Lawal, treated as forensic ethnography to illuminate how hybrid online fraud operates in practice. Lazarus argues that the case offers a rare empirical window into how romance fraud and Business Email Compromise (BEC) are interwoven within transnational laundering circuits, rather than existing as isolated schemes. The article uses courtroom transcripts, cooperating witness testimony, exhibits, and FBI material to examine the infrastructural logic, symbolic reasoning, and social arrangements that sustain these crimes, emphasizing the convergence of intimate deception and corporate fraud as a dual-modality fraud structure. Three core findings structure the analysis. First, identity modularity allows offenders to fluidly assume multiple personas and roles across fraud modalities, enabling operational flexibility and resilience. Second, romance fraud and BEC are strategically integrated, sharing networks, mule hierarchies, and narrative scripts that reinforce each other. Third, laundering infrastructures—though technologically sophisticated—are fragile in practice and embedded in transnational circuits that route funds through diaspora-linked and cross-border channels, complicating detection and recovery. The work also highlights how offenders reframed victims as “clients” within a commercial lexicon, an affective and moral disengagement strategy that frames exploitation as legitimate business. Limitations acknowledged include the single-case design and reliance on state-authored records, which may constrain ethnographic texture. The article concludes with theoretical and practical implications, calling for cross-disciplinary threat intelligence, enhanced banking and fintech collaboration, and international capacity-building to address hybrid fraud as a sociotechnical system.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Prior research underuses courtroom materials as ethnographic data, rarely integrates sociotechnical and relational perspectives, and seldom examines romance fraud and business email compromise (BEC) convergence within institutional settings. Existing frameworks often separate material infrastructures from interpersonal ties, while most research preserves a categorical divide between romance fraud and BEC. Single-case tracing of their fusion remains rare.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The study uses a forensic ethnography of United States v. Olugbenga Lawal, treating 72 pages of courtroom transcripts, testimony, exhibits, and related legal materials as sociocultural texts. It applies inductive thematic analysis, supported by Actor-Network Theory and Social Network Theory. The author manually open-coded relevant narrative material in Quirkos, generated 156 initial codes, refined themes through repeated review and reflexive memos, and interpreted findings within a forensic ethnographic framework.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The study is a single-case analysis of the Lawal proceedings, limiting broader generalization. Its reliance on a US Department of Justice pretrial detention memorandum and associated state-authored court records may privilege prosecutorial narratives of risk, culpability, and organizational structure. Offender rationalizations are indirect, filtered through interviews, testimony fragments, communications, and inferred practices rather than direct ethnographic engagement.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Triangulate courtroom records with interviews with offenders and victims to examine how fraud infrastructures operate outside court. Combine indictments with appellate opinions and investigator narratives to broaden empirical and interpretive scope. Comparative research across North and South contexts could examine the symbolic economies, vulnerabilities, and global circuits of hybrid fraud.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.