Skip to main content

Seeking Love and Companionship through Streaming: Unpacking Livestreamer-moderated Senior Matchmaking in China

Changyang He ; Lu He ; Zhicong Lu ; Bo Li (2023) — Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23)

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This CHI 2023 study investigates livestreamer-moderated matchmaking for single seniors in China, focusing on how live-streaming platforms, matchmakers, and senior participants cooperate to support late-life romance. The authors conducted a qualitative study with 12 senior match-seekers aged 50–70 and 6 female matchmakers, using observations and semi-structured interviews to uncover the practices, benefits, and challenges of this ecosystem. They describe an on-streaming and beyond-streaming workflow in which matchmakers coordinate introductions, mediate conversations, and extend services beyond the livestream to build trust and safety. Two principal interaction patterns emerge for relationship initiation on streaming. First, matchmaker-guided introductions use the live chat to prompt self-presentation, followed by the matchmaker arranging a phone-in with live video or audio so seekers can describe their profiles. Second, matchmaker-mediated communication involves the matchmaker organizing and moderating direct interaction between two seekers, guiding questions and disclosures to assess compatibility. The study also documents additional duties performed by matchmakers to improve service quality, including identity checks, safeguarding against fraud, and coordinating offline meetings. The authors discuss benefits such as greater authenticity, synchronous interaction, and a sense of community that can reduce loneliness for seniors. However, they also identify risks, including the presence of fraud by malicious matchmakers or confederates and the substantial repetitive labor required of matchmakers. Design implications include automating tedious tasks, strengthening safeguarding protocols, exploring fair business models, and extending accessibility for seniors with limited digital literacy. The work remains exploratory, noting the small sample and calling for further quantitative evaluation and cross-platform comparisons.

Identified Gaps

Little prior work had examined how seniors access online services through livestreaming or which service features need particular attention. The authors identify livestreamer-moderated senior matchmaking as underexplored, including its practices, relationship initiation, benefits, challenges, and safety. They also note a lack of large-scale quantitative evidence on preferred relationship-initiation methods and limited evidence across platform types and senior demographics.

Methods

This IRB-approved qualitative study combined approximately 48 hours of observations of 30 matchmakers’ livestreaming sessions with remote semi-structured interviews with 6 female livestreaming matchmakers and 12 senior match-seekers aged 50–70 in China. Data were collected in 2021, transcribed from Mandarin, and analyzed through open coding, coder consensus, member checking, source triangulation, and affinity diagramming.

Limitations

Most interviewees were urban smartphone users, limiting insight into rural, digitally less-skilled, and more vulnerable seniors. Most participants came from general livestreaming platforms rather than dating or senior-specific platforms. Recruitment through matchmakers may have excluded people with negative experiences. The study lacked large-scale quantitative analysis and did not systematically evaluate whether automating profile collection or identity checking would affect seniors’ acceptance and engagement.

Future Work

Future research should integrate matchmakers’ expertise into online dating systems; examine how livestreaming affects self-presentation and relationship development across populations and cultures; define matchmaker duties, protections, rewards, and regulation; compare practices across demographic groups; prototype and evaluate design implications; and develop accessible, safe, efficient senior matchmaking systems.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.